Is it considered 'cheating' . . .

Re: Is it considered 'cheating' . . .

Does it work for you?

If so I don't care and no one should... Or at least their opinion shouldn't matter to you...
*Russel Peter's voice*
Be a Man!
 
Re: Is it considered 'cheating' . . .

A painter usually has a few more tools then just a canvas, paint and brushes.
And most painters don't work with just the basic colours either.

So, whatever floats your boat.


There are some more tools to achieve the same effect.
Like the Fernandes Sustainer (Vai is a user) or a Sustainiac (is a brandname, which I didn't know untill I looked it up just now) or even an e-bow.


If I'm looking for a sound, and I know how to achieve it, why should I care how I did it (other then being able to replicate it)???
 
Re: Is it considered 'cheating' . . .

If it gets you the sound you're looking for -- or even pretty close to it -- I don't see what the problem is. Perhaps that it lacks authenticity? I see a live playing scenario as a great place to be result oriented.
 
Re: Is it considered 'cheating' . . .

Ask yourself this: "Who's being cheated?"

You? Only you can decide that for yourself, and only for yourself. You can't tell me I'm cheating, because I certainly don't feel cheated. I get the same end-results as anyone else who does it any other way, and that's all that matters.

The audience? They came to see a show/watch a band play music in real-time, not to listen to a CD player over the P.A.. Would any of them care how you got your feedback, or would their concern be more for what you did with it; how you incorporated it into your performance, and thus their entertainment? I'd assume they wouldn't walk out on you for using a pedal to entertain them. Other guitarists might, but you have to expect that if you're making music specifically for the 2nd-most self-important dooshnozzles alive (we're right behind singers).

The people who get the same effect "for realz"? Ted Nugent and his Byrdland and cranked Marshall? Screw 'em, their opinions on the subject of what anyone else does to get the same results are inconsequential to all except the sheeple.
 
Re: Is it considered 'cheating' . . .

Does it work for you?

If so I don't care and no one should... Or at least their opinion shouldn't matter to you...
*Russel Peter's voice*
Be a Man!


Ermmmm . . . never tried one.

I do not know how affective this box is.
 
Re: Is it considered 'cheating' . . .

Nope, no more than it is for me to use my Jackson with the Sustainiac in the neck for the same type of thing. ;)
 
Re: Is it considered 'cheating' . . .

Every possible thing you can imagine doing with a Boss pedal is not only allowed, it's required.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top