super rad stuff
Skaforlifeologist
Re: Is the Jazzmaster for me?



no high output needed here. I want the jazzmaster for what it is: a classic fender design, with unique pickups and a trem.(
I wish I could put a wide range humbucker in the neck of my tele.![]()
must. acquire. jazzmaster.
This is why I bought a beaten up, pre-owned Fender CIJ Jaguar and fitted Antiquities and USA pots. (NOTE: The 1meg pots are important. The resistance taper is not much use but changing to 500 or 250k messes up the tone.) This guitar does "textural" tones.
A school contemporary of mine owned a CBS-era Fender Telecaster Deluxe. Through his Park (a Marshall pseudonym) Master Volume 50w valve combo, the neck pickup on that guitar did a fantastic Hendrix "All Along The Watchtower" solo tone.
My Jag has an Antiquity I bridge PU and an Antiquity II neck. I do not know whether the same options are available for the JM? IMO, Five-Twos for JM would be interesting.
So let me get this straight. What the forum is insinuating is that the Jazzmaster's pickups sound great BUT it would sound even better if I dropped some duncans for jazzmaster in it?
OPINION: The Fender Jazzmaster does some interesting sounds that your Gibson and hot-rodded Stratocaster-derived guitars can not.
FACT: There is a wide range of price points from USA Custom Shop signature models through Japanese and Mexican replicas down to Squiers that are only loosely based on the original design.
The questions you need to ask yourself are;
1) How often are you going to play this guitar?
2) How much money do you want to pay for the privilege?
3) If you only really use this "alternative" guitar for recording projects, can you justify spending over a thousand dollars to buy it?
This is the process by which I "rationalised" purchasing and modifying my CIJ Jag. Total cost to me, four hundred pounds (approx. 550 USD) including brand new, form-fitted Hiscox Liteflite case.
The truth is that there was nothing rational about my decision. Somebody traded the Jag in my local music store. The shop proprietor knew that I wanted one but not enough to pay full MSRP. Ker-ching!
I, for one, am not suggesting that you pay full price for a Fender CS Jazzmaster and then immediately start mangling it. On the other hand, dropping Duncans into a mid-priced JM replica is justifiable. I enjoy my modified CIJ Jag. It has character.
If it is literally the Jaguar body shape, but with the strat scale, I believe I'll really be into it, it's the best of both worlds, like combining my two favorite guitars.
I don't like that they're black. Can they be ordered in the cream kind of color seen in the jazzmaster picture?
Yes, the JM is literally the Jaguar body shape except that, chronologically speaking, the JM predates the Jaguar.
QPs are usually meant to be installed without a cover. Their rod magnet polepieces are flush with the vulcanised fibreboard top plate of the pickup. I imagine that the QPs will fit inside a the plastic pickup cover but, of course, the polepieces will not protrude like a vintage instrument. No big deal.
Pity that the Hot and QP versions are not offered a with coil-tapping option.
Finally, have you listened to the Sound Clips of any of your preferred replacement pickups?
I'm not sure, but somewhere on this site I believe it says the JM pups are furnished without covers. That leads me to believe that the SD JM pups are to be mounted under the
cream (covers?) furnished with the guitar.
Can someone clear this up?
upon listening to clips and viewing youtube videos:
the vintage is more or less what I want. the hot isnt as hot as i thought.
theyre probably equally noisy right?
heres a question: do you guys think the vintage best represents the classic jazzmaster sound, since it shoots for it, while the pickups fender puts on the guitar are just fender brand single coils?
I don't like that they're black. Can they be ordered in the cream kind of color seen in the jazzmaster picture?