Re: Jcm 800 2210 Reverb: Yay or Nay?
Well thanks for the kudos there TGWIF!
Alas, the great and mysterious ch. switching JCM800's..... never has there been so much confusion and very strong "opinions" that seem to conflict around one amp........wondering why?
Somewhere around 1985, Marshall "very quietly" redesigned the Ch. Switching 800's but never "officially" said anything about it.....These changes are by far the most radical design change to an amp "midstream" in a production run in the history of guitar amps! The two versions do not sound anything alike, and thus most people's opinions are based on one or the other.....thus being a great source of "confusion" and often leads to major dissapointment after a purchase of one of these....if you're expecting to get the "other" version.
I own 3 2210's and 2 2205's, have modded more of these than I can count, including the combo variant models like forumite Jeff_H's 4210.....(he's got some really good pics!)
Michael Schenker plays through the "early" version 2205
Tom Morello plays through the "later" design 2205
Anyway as far as the original "reverb" question the early verion 2210's used the long 2 spring Accutronics, which partially blocked the "top vent" that is standard to 100w Marshalls, the later versions used the shorter 3 spring tank. (No offense meant Lew, but they are tube driven....just to clarify)
I can't really compare the two of them, but suffice to say I'll give both of them a "thumbs up" and I use reverb all the time!!!!
As always, hope it helped.....
Jeff Seal