Re: JCM900 tube troubles
Yep new tubes - eh or the lps sovteks - actually you can save some money by just putting in 2 power tubes and switching your JC to 50 watts. I had a 900 dual reverb in the 90s and found that a 4x12 and 100watts was too much to use for most gigs so i could never really drive the amp properly. 50 watts = less headroom but a much fatter sound because you can actually run some signal thru the power tubes. You will actually have way more headroom than an 8 year old quartet will give you anyway.
I disagree with the idea of pulling two tubes .... but that is just my personal take on things. Here is a clipped section of something I wrote a number of years ago on the subject ....
Then there are those folks that have the great idea of pulling two tubes out of their 100 watt amp to turn it into a 50 watt amp. To put it bluntly and
get a lot of argument, this is a stupid idea.
A great amp is made up of many components. Power transformers, output transformers, capacitors, and other parts, make up the design. If one takes a Marshall 100 watt Super Lead, and pulls two of the tubes, and properly sets the impedance selector, turning the amp into a 50 watt amp, what actually happens? Well, we have a 100 watt power supply, that is now even less taxed than before. The "50 watt" Marshall will now have less dynamics, less feel, less touch sensitivity. It will be a nice, clean, hi-fi, 50 watt amp. It?s 100 watt power supply will never reach saturation. Its output transformer will never be pushed. It will actually be cleaner than it was as a 100 watt amp.
The only distortion you will get is when the output tubes are at their limit, and this will be an unbalanced sound, although some might think this is
just to their own tastes.