Just What are "Cleans" and which amps get them

Re: Just What are "Cleans" and which amps get them

How about mullard, phillips holland ,and telefunken 12AX7 preamp tubes Wah-Wah, if your still out there ?

They were all great tube manufacturers in their day, especially during the Golden Era in the 50's and early 60's. The trade embargo in the 60's between the US and UK meant that when Jim Marshall and Ken Bran were developing the first Marshalls, based of course on the Fender Bassman circuit, they couldn't get access to RCA's anyway, and instead used the local product, Mullards from the Blackburn plant. The frequency range of Mullards is not as broad as the old RCA black plates, which leads to their pronounced midrange, which then of course became an essential part of the Marshall sound. Driving Mullards in the front of an amp would lead to the pushed mid overdrive that has become synonymous with Marshall, and is also part of the reason why they are not known for their clean sounds, especially with humbuckers or higher output pickups generally.

Philips, Siemens, Valvo, Amperex and Telefunken preamp tubes are better known for their use in audio equipment other than guitar amps, since Holland and Germany were not as prolific in their production of popular guitar amps as the US and England. You would find Telefunkens in old Neumann tube mics, and Philips in domestic audio equipment, and of course every tube manufacturer on the planet had contracts with their local military. It wasn't until the major US and UK plants started shutting down with the advent of the transistor that these other brands started to be preferable in guitar amps to the Eastern Bloc tubes which were always considered to be of inferior quality. As a result, those brands are not considered as being part of the signature sound of the better known amp brands.

Having said all of that, you can certainly pull a great clean sound from the tube brands mentioned. The old RCA's are hard to beat because they were the tubes that the early Fenders were designed around, just as these days, amps are designed around 25c Chinese and Russian tubes and therefore vintage tubes often won't make an appreciable difference in those amps. In the right amp, the high headroom and broad frequency response of the RCA black plates makes for spectacular clean sounds.



Cheers..................................wahwah
 
Re: Just What are "Cleans" and which amps get them

Cleans are what I get when I turn my amp down to low....
 
Re: Just What are "Cleans" and which amps get them

Let me see if I understand this correctly: Clean just means no overdrive/distortion. Dry means no effects. A preferred clean sound is with chorus, reverb, delay, phaser. Can't get any usable clean sounds from solid state amps and modern tubes suck.

Well then, I guess I'll just play a dry acoustic guitar and hope for the best.
 
Re: Just What are "Cleans" and which amps get them

Let me see if I understand this correctly:

Ok, let's see.

Clean just means no overdrive/distortion.

Yes, you understood that correctly. Clean as opposed to overdriven or distorted. Nothing to do with effects.

Dry means no effects.

Yes, you understood that correctly. Dry as opposed to "wet." This is why many effects have a dry/wet balance. Nothing to do with overdrive or distortion or being "clean."

A preferred clean sound is with chorus, reverb, delay, phaser.

No, you made this one up. This is what I actually said.

Therefore, you can have a clean signal which is bathed in phaser, chorus, reverb or delay, and still be clean. As for what constitutes a "good" clean sound, that is totally subjective.

There's no reference made to the use of effects with a clean sound being "preferred." Selective reading perhaps?


Can't get any usable clean sounds from solid state amps

No, you made this one up too. Here's what I actually said.

Some will site the Roland JC-120 as the ultimate clean sound, whereas I can't stand 'em, along with just about every other solid state front end amp I've ever heard! But that hasn't stopped others getting great clean sounds from them.

It's difficult, or rather, impossible, to substantiate your interpretation when I clearly state that using solid state front ends "hasn't stopped others getting great clean sounds from them."


and modern tubes suck.

Yes, compared to the classic tubes from the Golden Era, in terms of tone, stability, longevity and quality control, modern tubes suck.


Well then, I guess I'll just play a dry acoustic guitar and hope for the best.

Ok then!




Cheers.................................wahwah
 
Re: Just What are "Cleans" and which amps get them

Vintage HIWATTs are arguably the cleanest of any tube amp.
 
Re: Just What are "Cleans" and which amps get them

Thanks, Wahwah! Yes, it was selective interpretation on my part. I'll settle down now.
 
Re: Just What are "Cleans" and which amps get them

Vintage HIWATTs are arguably the cleanest of any tube amp.
True! -missed that obvious one out. A DR103 with a fane cab is possibly the ultimate high-wattage tube clean experience.
 
Re: Just What are "Cleans" and which amps get them

the amp i have (univox u-1226) came with original general electric Mullard tubes in it. they're over 30 years old and they still sound good. i loved the way the clean signal sounded. i took the tubes out for fear of killing such nice sounding tubes. if you get a chance pick up some Mullard tubes in the right amp your clean signal will sound amazing.
 
Back
Top