I think the usual barroom / backyard party patrons have some sense of good tone... especially those of our generation who grew up on 70's - 80's rock.
The distinction between a righteous tone that gives us a tone-bone, and good sound. I NEVER support a bad sound/mix.
However, it is nice when we go the extra mile and someone takes the time after the set to tell us they noticed.
they just want the band to rock. I think in some ways as guitarists we unnecessarily put too much pressure on ourselves sometimes.
Could we see a list of those Line 6 POD touring pros? Never seen a little red kidney shaped thing at a live show but they are small so I'd like to know...
Interesting discussion.
The closer you get to a perfect system, the more apparent its shortcomings will be.
Even if you can nail every classic tone in the book, you've essentially reduced your sound to a facsimile of other people.
People will remember you for being you, not for being everyone else all at once. Players need identity.
It is amazing to me how many players don't care about identity, and rejoice in sounding like a facsimile of other people.
Agreed. The one thing I do not like about this new cover gig is the lack of identity and creativity. I need to start looking for an original side gig before I get too comfortable with this thing.
Agreed. The one thing I do not like about this new cover gig is the lack of identity and creativity. I need to start looking for an original side gig before I get too comfortable with this thing.
Interesting discussion.
Even if you can nail every classic tone in the book, you've essentially reduced your sound to a facsimile of other people.
People will remember you for being you, not for being everyone else all at once. Players need identity.
It is amazing to me how many players don't care about identity, and rejoice in sounding like a facsimile of other people.
At the same time, there are very few pro (those who made the big time) guitar players out there with a unique, identifiable tone... compared to those without.
Lots of facsimilies in the pro world when it comes to tone... playing too. For example, the 80's were full of pro Ed clones.
(As well, there's no one on this forum with a unique, identifiable guitar tone)
Tone is finite... and it's all been done before. Just like a lot of the songs that have been written... they're all rehashed, regurgitated, etc... from something that came before it.
Identity as a guitarist comes from your solo phrasing, note choice and chord progressions etc (technique) far more than any tone. Add looks to the mix too, I suppose.
Nowadays, no guitarist who does standard stuff (e.g. not weird ****) is such a unique and special snowflake that they can claim to be 100% original... playing or tone wise.
(if they do claim to be, they are filled with delusions of grandeur and probably aren't very good)
You are a product of your guitar heroes.. and in turn, their guitar heroes that came before them... and so on.
There's nothing new under the sun.
Having a musical identity does not imply uniqueness. It doesn't even have to be particularly interesting or impressive one either. Most of the greats are copying a handful of their own heroes. The point is that they made it their own thing.
JB, I agree, most people don't like it.
And those of us who do, prefer it that way [emoji41]