Mikelamury
New member
Is it possible to wire a Les Paul to where I can have it in the middle position with one volume at 0 without turning the whole guitar off?
^ Google "Les Paul independent volumes".
Basically you need to swap the pickup hot and volume pot wires over on each volume pot.
I don't know why, but you also need to ensure there us no volume pot casing to volume pot casing ground. Ground each volume pot casing to its respective tone pot casing, then ground both of those to each other then to the output jack ground.
Also, fitting treble bleeds helps curtail the treble loss when you turn the volumes down.
^ Google "Les Paul independent volumes".
Basically you need to swap the pickup hot and volume pot wires over on each volume pot.
I don't know why, but you also need to ensure there us no volume pot casing to volume pot casing ground. Ground each volume pot casing to its respective tone pot casing, then ground both of those to each other then to the output jack ground. Do not create a ring in the grounds between pots. I say "ring" to avoid confusion with "ground loop", which is an entirely different thing. Some say this is rubbish, but from personal experience on my SG, LP and an HH Strat I've found it necessary.
Also, fitting treble bleeds helps curtail the treble loss when you turn the volumes down.
So are you saying that there is no way to wire the Les Paul to not cut out the whole guitar when one of the volumes is off while in the middle position?
I've already shown that this is indeed BS. No matter how you run the ground wires, if you have everything grounded then the two vol pot cases WILL be grounded to each other. But because there isn't a direct wire connecting them, (going from vol to tone to tone to vol, using an extra 6" of wire) it will take the electrons at most about a millionth of a second longer to get from one pot to the other (do the math if you don't believe me). If you think that this 1/1,000,000th second is significant, give me some proof other than "I experienced some problems when I rewired a guitar like that"...since there are other factors that could be involved with your wiring expertise. In MY experience of wiring guitars for 60 years, I have never, never, no NEVER experienced the SLIGHTEST problem directly grounding one vol pot to the other (since, in FACT, there is NO electrical difference).
You can keep saying there is a problem, but that doesn't make it so (especially when no one else in the world says it is a problem). OK, maybe that's an exaggeration because you can always find someone who will say anything.
Please don't mislead people on the forum who are searching for some truthful answers to their questions.
Or wire with 50s wiring.

You may not want to throw more money at this, AND you may not want to install a 9-volt battery, but just as an FYI, Bartolini makes a dual buffer designed to solve this exact problem.
https://bartolini.net/product/agb/
You'd want the AGDB / 918-2. Also allows you to balance two different output pups.
filedata/fetch?id=6185225&d=1657914230
You just have to connect the pots backwards. A Jazz bass is an example. But as I said earlier in the thread, you pay a price.

Do you mean hot to casing and ground to input?
Do you mean hot to casing and ground to input?
^ I beg to differ.
I've actually tried it. Have you?
Fralin pickups tell one not to.
What if I run each pickup to it's respective volume pot then only connect the volume and tone pots via the tone cap then have a wire fun from each tone pot output and meet up at the input if the output jack with no other connections from any pots? Would that work?
I'm referring to the ground wire not the lead wires.
First take a look at standard 'modern' wiring. (Don't think about 50's vs Modern or anything else for the moment. Let's just solve one problem at a time...)
![]()
Then look carefully at the "independent volumes" version. Notice that the pickups (along with the tone/cap connection) are now wired to the middle lug, and the output to the switch is now on the outside where the pickups and tone cap used to be.
![]()