beaubrummels
Well-known member
Part 1
Part 2
Part 4
…did I miss something?
Part 2
Part 4
…did I miss something?
If I were to dream up a perfect amp for me, I would build one with 3 channels that are switchable. First channel would be a Fender blackface channel that can be switched from blackface to tweed on the face of the amp. Second channel would be a Plexi channel that is switchable from plexiglass to JCM. The third channel would be a Dumble circuit that is switchable between two of Dumble's best circuits, so in essence, it would be an amp with nine voices.
Now, how to do that.....that's a whole new episode.
The closest I know -Theres an boutique amp company in Florida (name escapes me right now) that makes something in this vein -except Fender Blackface and Plexi 2 channel 1x12 open back combo -getting Dumble requires messing with the tone stack on the Black face channel -and you can get decently close -but you cant easily switch between then of course.
Nice amp for studio/recording especially
-expensive as you might imagine. -I think it was mid 2ks.
It's not exactly the same, but the Mesa Mark V comes really close to that description.
Power tubes are going to be a compromise because Fender tones don't sound quite right with EL-34s while Marshalls sound kind of off with 6L6s; I say that after having played a JCM800 circuit with 6L6s and a Mesa preamp with an EL-34 power amp. Of the two the 6L6/JCM800 sounded less 'off', hence my recommendation for the Mark V.
Part 1
Part 2
Part 4
…did I miss something?
Loving this thread -I think an interesting challenge with building new amps be it from scratch and especially from a kit (I've done both many times) is often they sound a little sterile versus the amp style they are inspired from, sometimes with some playing and age the amps settle in, so I'm sure some of the mojo from our favorite amps is some time and heat cycles on the components -and then nostalgia messing with your empirical mind. -since Ive done blind A/B tests when recording amps -I know that the sterility of new amps is not just an emotional attachment thing.
When I first started working in recording studios, Peavey was most often the brand that you could often demonstrate "sterility" in an amp sound -maybe it is the components, the design, or the revolutionary manufacturing process -or maybe they were making a more on the noes or efficient amp which creates less nuance that the ear sounds pleasurable.
Loving this thread -I think an interesting challenge with building new amps be it from scratch and especially from a kit (I've done both many times) is often they sound a little sterile versus the amp style they are inspired from, sometimes with some playing and age the amps settle in, so I'm sure some of the mojo from our favorite amps is some time and heat cycles on the components -and then nostalgia messing with your empirical mind. -since Ive done blind A/B tests when recording amps -I know that the sterility of new amps is not just an emotional attachment thing.
When I first started working in recording studios, Peavey was most often the brand that you could often demonstrate "sterility" in an amp sound -maybe it is the components, the design, or the revolutionary manufacturing process -or maybe they were making a more on the noes or efficient amp which creates less nuance that the ear sounds pleasurable.
Oh come on EZ. . . You need to use tone wood
I agree... no scientific proof here, but it does seem a freshly built amp does sound a little "sterile".
I did almost a 100% overhaul of my Marshall up back in 2003... it's now 2022 and it sounds fantastic. Granted the circuit has changed from '66 JTM45 to '68 Plexi, but it did seem a little sterile after I had replaced the stock PCB with my populated turret board, swapped out stock OT, wired everything up, etc and fired it up the first time.
Totally; there's gotta be some settling in and values drifting...
Back in the day Peavey was the tone-deaf cheap man's amp. It did one thing well though: it worked. :lol: