Re: Miking guitar amp?
Then you are ahead of the curve, it takes a long time for some people to understand that a cut is as good as a boost, better in fact many times from noise reduction and headroom perspectives.
That does require mixing the two to get the balance you want (because of the phase cancellations), even so ...for home recording panning one hard right, and the other hard left; with a subtle mix in the middle, is a great way to create a stereo track ...helps to EQ each a bit differently also (which they will be anyway), but it enhances the effect.
Even in mono with mixing between the two adds an interesting spaciousness and air to the sound.
Ah, room miking, far miking do lose a lot of focus, but if you have two mikes to play with you can get some really good results, stereo or mono. Someone mentioned the 58 also, the main difference in the 57 and 58 is that the 58 has a presence peak around 3kHz. or so, and a bit leaner low end (still exhibits the proximity effect though), if you run a bright set up it might not be your cup of tea, but it does make a nice addition to the 57 or replacement for it at times.
NT02 said:Wow, cool replies. Mike, good suggestions. I do the best I can to get the tone I want without eqing the signal. If I do eq, it's usually to take out an unwanted frequency, but rarely do I boost anything.
Then you are ahead of the curve, it takes a long time for some people to understand that a cut is as good as a boost, better in fact many times from noise reduction and headroom perspectives.
KentS, great info. Funny, I've experimented with putting the mic in the open cab, and love the darker sound, but miss the high end. It never occured to me to use two mics, one in the cab and one on the speaker. Duh!
That does require mixing the two to get the balance you want (because of the phase cancellations), even so ...for home recording panning one hard right, and the other hard left; with a subtle mix in the middle, is a great way to create a stereo track ...helps to EQ each a bit differently also (which they will be anyway), but it enhances the effect.
Even in mono with mixing between the two adds an interesting spaciousness and air to the sound.
Thanks for the link, Kevlar.
Architect, thanks for the mic suggestion and info. I've messed with room micing, and always come back to putting the mic on the speaker. Course, that has always been with only one mic. Think I'll buy a new mic this weekend and expirement. My control room with my computer is also my amp room.I have a modest setup and record at home as a hobby. I have LOTS to learn!
Ah, room miking, far miking do lose a lot of focus, but if you have two mikes to play with you can get some really good results, stereo or mono. Someone mentioned the 58 also, the main difference in the 57 and 58 is that the 58 has a presence peak around 3kHz. or so, and a bit leaner low end (still exhibits the proximity effect though), if you run a bright set up it might not be your cup of tea, but it does make a nice addition to the 57 or replacement for it at times.