KLINKDETROIT
New member
Anyone have thoughts?
Woho hell no! It's quite smooth actually. Too smooth for some.James Rock said:isnt the V30 meant to be harsh
James Rock said:isnt the V30 meant to be harsh
Kommerzbassist said:Woho hell no! It's quite smooth actually. Too smooth for some.
JeffB said:Respectfully disagree
Compared to 75s, perhaps...
V30 is the JB of Celestions. Harsh upper mid spike. Cuts though great but for many (myself included) is annoying as all get-out.
Greenbacks and the H30s are tough to beat, and IMO are the key speaker for classic Marshall tone of the 60s/70s. Then the 800s/75s hit....the "LA" sound..not my thing.
No, not at all IMO, remember, the GB is rated at 97 or 98 db, the V30 is rated at 100db, the V30 will be noticeably louder next to a GB. The GB's LF specs at 75hz, and the V30/G12H30 each go down to 70hz, adding more lows. You might want to think about a V30/G12H30 combination, the two speakers working together kinda cover each others weakness. And they have much more low end definition.taphappy said:So basically the Greenbacks are a no go on metal that requires a tight sound?
Thats the kinda info people need to know because of course the sound different like who would but an alnico blue in a mesa cab but there the best for vox'sThe Vintage 30 usually sounds alot deeper, warmer and thicker in a sealed 4 x 12 cabinet than it does in an open back combo amp.
The Greenback sounds better in a sealed 4 x 12 cab too...and it sounds like it's lacking in bass in an open back combo amp.
That said, the Greenback still sounds better than most older Utah, CTS, Eminence, etc. speakers.
Lew