I need it to my Kramer 84. I like evh tone
Well, I might stay away from the very dynamic unpotted pickups, as they might feed back with volume and gain. I'd get a 78 and call it a day.
Yea, i nead most dynamic PAF but wax potted![]()
I heard dimarzio 59 and sound great too.
78 is expensive, but I will consider it.
What do you think about aph-1 or pearly Gates?
0:24 https://youtu.be/gdO7lyzUTxo
I like how Eddie plays with dynamic. When hit light has muddy quieter tone, when hit stron has bright loud tone on Distortion! I belive its A2.
I has custom obervound PAF 12k with A5, when I switched to A2, it give me better dynamic and this result, light touch muddy, strong touch bright, but its sound too dark for me.
Dimarzio 59? Doesn't exist. Dimarzio PAF, yes, Seymour Duncan '59. Yes.
Having that overwound PAF, with an alnico2, yes that does sound like a pickup made to sound fatty/muddy.
Would you guys consider A2 more dynamic?
I would say A5 is bolder and faster-responding (just speaking in tone lingo and personal opinion, nothing technical).
I would think an A5 PAF is usually more "dynamic" than the equivalent A2 variation. But I've never ever really tried the same PAF-type with both magnets other than the Slash, which I didn't like anyway.
But in any case, I would consider one of those Humbucker-sized Filterton-types would be more articulate and dynamic, no?
The Pearly Gates to me has way to much sizzle on the top end.I heard dimarzio 59 and sound great too.
78 is expensive, but I will consider it.
What do you think about aph-1 or pearly Gates?