Andrew Lamprecht
Minion of One
Just got one of these for $30 in perfect condition with all the papers/disc/box. Picking it up sometime tomorrow. I'll list one of my reel to reels to get the money back but I'd say I got a pretty decent deal. 
NAD: Fender content. ;)
- Thread starter Andrew Lamprecht
- Start date
UberMetalDood
New member
Re: NAD: Fender content. 
Congratulations. It sounds like a great deal. I admit that I have had some fun playing those little Fender modeling amps on a few occasions. I've often thought about getting one of those or a Roland cube. I saw a video a while back about Eric Johnson using one backstage.
Congratulations. It sounds like a great deal. I admit that I have had some fun playing those little Fender modeling amps on a few occasions. I've often thought about getting one of those or a Roland cube. I saw a video a while back about Eric Johnson using one backstage.
FuseG4
Our Neighbor Totoro
Re: NAD: Fender content.
It doesn't take overdrive pedals all that gracefully. At low pedal volume things sound OK but certainly blurry, messy, and excessively rough. Much volume boost to the front end is not handled so well by the DSP. Sometimes a little splattyness in your tone is OK but it all just sounds like a pedal in front of a modeling amp.
The twin model is my favorite for my pedals but it's still not like a tube amp to me.
The amp IS quite good at recognizing how an amp *should* react to pickup output and playing dynamics, but outside of certain input ranges it's just not designed to work the same I guess.
oh and to the OP, congrats! great practice/jam tool. I just sold mine and so now I can't play amplified at 5 am
It doesn't take overdrive pedals all that gracefully. At low pedal volume things sound OK but certainly blurry, messy, and excessively rough. Much volume boost to the front end is not handled so well by the DSP. Sometimes a little splattyness in your tone is OK but it all just sounds like a pedal in front of a modeling amp.
The twin model is my favorite for my pedals but it's still not like a tube amp to me.
The amp IS quite good at recognizing how an amp *should* react to pickup output and playing dynamics, but outside of certain input ranges it's just not designed to work the same I guess.
oh and to the OP, congrats! great practice/jam tool. I just sold mine and so now I can't play amplified at 5 am
Last edited:
Lazarus1140
New member
Re: NAD: Fender content.
Running pedals into a modeling amp should be about as satisfying as having intimate relations with a blow-up doll.
Running pedals into a modeling amp should be about as satisfying as having intimate relations with a blow-up doll.
dominus
King Midas to Cheap Guitars
Re: NAD: Fender content.
Depends on the modeler, it doesn't hurt to try. I just got a Vox Stomplab and it took a pair of Overdrive pedals in front just fine. (A little noisy with both engaged, but it wasn't a digital noise.)
Depends on the modeler, it doesn't hurt to try. I just got a Vox Stomplab and it took a pair of Overdrive pedals in front just fine. (A little noisy with both engaged, but it wasn't a digital noise.)
TheLivingDead
Dawn Of The Shred
Re: NAD: Fender content.
Awesome deal!
Awesome deal!
That90'sGuy
DyzaBoyzologist
Re: NAD: Fender content.
Yep, you can't beat that for the price : )
Yep, you can't beat that for the price : )
Similar threads
