NAD- Mesa Recto Reborn
- Thread starter Jeff5
- Start date
PFDarkside
of the Forum
Re: NAD- Mesa Recto Reborn
I've been out of the Mesa world, what's a "Reborn"?
I've been out of the Mesa world, what's a "Reborn"?
Petrovsk Mizinski
New member
Re: NAD- Mesa Recto Reborn
Congrats! Great sounding amps.
They were released about 5 years ago, so that's quite the rock you've been living under
There has been been various revisions over the course of the Recto's history, and the this is the current one.
It has the Multi-Watt feature (50W or 100W for the Dual, 50W or 150W for the Triple), improved FX loop, tuner out and a couple of other new/improved features. They've been revoiced slightly too.
FWIW, the Single Recto was discontinued many years ago too. With the Mini Rectos and the Multi-Watt feature of the full size heads, the Single Recto was more or less made redundant in their line up.
Congrats! Great sounding amps.
They were released about 5 years ago, so that's quite the rock you've been living under
There has been been various revisions over the course of the Recto's history, and the this is the current one.
It has the Multi-Watt feature (50W or 100W for the Dual, 50W or 150W for the Triple), improved FX loop, tuner out and a couple of other new/improved features. They've been revoiced slightly too.
FWIW, the Single Recto was discontinued many years ago too. With the Mini Rectos and the Multi-Watt feature of the full size heads, the Single Recto was more or less made redundant in their line up.
HALENisking
New member
Re: NAD- Mesa Recto Reborn
The reissue, circa 2010 I believe. Slightly redesigned.
Ah, got beat to it.
The reissue, circa 2010 I believe. Slightly redesigned.
Ah, got beat to it.
Re: NAD- Mesa Recto Reborn
Been having a lot of fun with this amp so far. The FX loop is really good but man, I don't know why, there is just something else that happens when I bypass it. It's almost the same thing with my mini, but not as drastic. This is first time I may actually consider just not using a loop at all. Mind you it does not sound bad with the loop, far from it.
Been having a lot of fun with this amp so far. The FX loop is really good but man, I don't know why, there is just something else that happens when I bypass it. It's almost the same thing with my mini, but not as drastic. This is first time I may actually consider just not using a loop at all. Mind you it does not sound bad with the loop, far from it.
some_dude
Raging BB Gunologist
Re: NAD- Mesa Recto Reborn
For me, I find the amp generally sounds better if I run the channel masters low (9:00-10:00) and the master output up higher... but I agree, as hard as I've tried it does sound better with the FX loop bypassed.
That said, if you're playing live you'd be hard pressed to tell the difference.
For me, I find the amp generally sounds better if I run the channel masters low (9:00-10:00) and the master output up higher... but I agree, as hard as I've tried it does sound better with the FX loop bypassed.
That said, if you're playing live you'd be hard pressed to tell the difference.
PFDarkside
of the Forum
Re: NAD- Mesa Recto Reborn
Jeff, I agree about the loops, etc. The more stuff I remove from my Road King the better it sounds. Loops, solo boost, overall master, channel switching, etc. With just 4 individual amps effectively, it just sounds better with less between the guitar and the speaker!
Just a reissue with multi-watt? I knew about the mini, etc.They were released about 5 years ago, so that's quite the rock you've been living under
Jeff, I agree about the loops, etc. The more stuff I remove from my Road King the better it sounds. Loops, solo boost, overall master, channel switching, etc. With just 4 individual amps effectively, it just sounds better with less between the guitar and the speaker!
Similar threads
