videos comparing jb pickup vs. distortion. same guitar same amp settings same crappy webcam mic. i think the distortion could sound better but i recorded it with the settings i use for the jb to get d.r.i. four of a kind tone. i usualy use more mids but these setting got me closest to the sound i was looking for with the jb. anyeays...
jb;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lk2x16mbuTI
distortion;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnfCeSt1yso
what do you mean?I gotta ask, dont you get a sore wrist fretting like that?
what do you mean?
Honestly, the amp means more than the pup IMO - and lower output will do more for you than mega output, IMO. But the right feel and tone curve is important.
never have any problems. i usualy sling my guitar a lot higher than mpst metal guys. maybe because i was sitting down?Your wrist is at a fairly acute angle.
i played for a little while today with the distortion and actualy think it sounded better with the gain dialed back. looking for crunch and less growl. i dont like the sound of either pickup palm muted. the distortion has less growl but the jb has a nicer tone. the distortion has more treble but its a harsh teble. i just cant dial out the growl. the bass is on 2 in both video's. maybe ill try the eq between the guitar and amp.As I was reading through this thread I was thinking the same thing. If what you're essentially after is the proper tonal curve why wouldn't you look beyond the typical "metal" offerings and just turn up the amp's gain?
never have any problems. i usualy sling my guitar a lot higher than mpst metal guys. maybe because i was sitting down?
we cool. i didnt take it as criticism. i alway thoght guys like james hetfeild looked so cool with there guitars slung so low, but i cant pull it off. i look more like b.b. king.-lolIt wasnt a criticism in any way (have you SEEN Marty Friedmans hand, hahaha!), just looked uncomfortable.
A lot of people describe this pickup as being too harsh, cold and overly hot. It's came stock in the Les Paul Classic with the 496R, Les Paul Studio Lite, as well as the Jimmy Page LP, Joe Perry LP and a few others. Most people think its heresy to put these pickups in a Les Paul at all, since they use ceramic magnets, and it's just not a "Vintage" tone (it isn't). As such, they tend to get ripped out and replaced with lower output, A2 or A5 mag pickups to get that "classic" Les Paul sound.
I hated the 496R - it lacked character. The 500T is a different story. If you don't think of it as a Les Paul pickup and think of it as a hard rock/metal pickup AND you actually take the time to adjust the tone controls on your rig/guitar to suit this pickup, it shreds. People also say it's a one trick pony. Well, that's probably true, but it's a hell of a trick and the pony has got balls and will kick your teeth in.
IMHO, of course.
rich ward records 4 tracks. 2 panned hard left and 2 panned hard right.rich ward not only uses a PATB1 in an LP, but also tracks everything 10 times
aready up to speed there. new F&T power supply caps and Sprague Atom bias supply caps. amp is biased to 25w*.7/B+
i threw the jj's in cause i had them and they sounded much better that the sovteks. it also has sovtek 6550we wich i might switch out for some winged =C='s. when i bought the amp it was biased at 98ma!!! its now running around 37ma w/464v on the plates.
i check out the tubes. thanks
Sovteks and jjs are not all bad. They have their purpose. The 12ax7LPS is the best phase inverter tube IMO. JJs work well in some gain stages to add beef and mids, and they do well in cathode followers, but not as a V1 or main tone stages. Unless that's your thing of course. Ya gotta mix n' match 'em til' ya git the right ballance!![]()
Then Tung-Sols may just be the ticket. Of the new production tubes I've tried, I like Tung-Sols the best and JJs the worst. I think the Russian factory tubes are just better than the ones coming out of the JJ factory. (For reference, at least the Tung-Sols, ElectroHarmonix, Mullard Reissue, and Sovtek brands come out of there.)
I just cannot get along with the JJs. They don't have any clarity, to my ears. The Tung-Sols are gainy and full, but still bright. The Mullard RI are pretty smooth, but still with a grainy character. A lot of people like the ElectroHarmonix, but to me they sounded a bit thinner than the Tung-Sols.
Anyways, good luck, and seriously consider getting the amp into top working shape before you do too much to the guitar. Once you can hear the guitar properly, then you'll know what to do with it.
rich ward records 4 tracks. 2 panned hard left and 2 panned hard right.