New PAF Variant from Dimarzio

anyway, specs are almost identical to tonerider alnico 2 pickups, scattered winding too :D

You can see those specs almost every pickup builder from Gibson to any other boutique winders. I think the only exception was Dimarzio and now they have, too :)
 
no, pafs were not scatter wound. they were machine wound, usually on a leesona 102 gibson purchased in 1954. granted machine wound on that machine didnt have the same tight tolerances we have today, but its still machine wound. duncan has the actual winder from the gibson factory and uses it on many of their vintage paf type pups
 
i think that was a fender thing. seth had a spec of 5k turns per bobbin. a p90 had a 10k turn spec, so he split it between the two bobbins and p90s and pafs were machine wound. granted it wasnt auto stop so someone started and stopped the machine which is part of the reason things are all over the place
 
These look really nice!

Now, just imagine this: if they sound really good, and are only a c note a piece, the boutique guys are gonna take a sizeable hit.

I've always wondered what'd happen if dimarzio just bit the bullet and made a period/spec correct PAF. Now we get to find out!

I'd give em a shot.

I hope they offer them in all the colors and covers though.

So, to recap, dimazio owns PAF, double cream, AND they're now making period correct stuff.

Can anyone say "public enemy number one"? LOL
 
Last edited:
There isn't just one "PAF" sound, so DMz hasn't suddenly taken all the other winders out. They just reduced some of the angst of getting a PAF type in double cream. Also, by way of example, IME DMz' previous PAF pickups were more unclear/muddier/undetailed than any one of Duncan's various equivalent PAF types that I tried in the same guitar.
 
I like the PAF 36th Anni and the PAF Pro. Dimarzio has a tendency to make non-traditional low output pickups and just call them PAF-whatever. The ones I tried sound good, tho.
 
Back
Top