OCD V2 verses prev version?

BloodRose

Professional Scapegoat
Anyone played the new V2 OCD that can say how (if at all) it differs tonally from previous ones? I know the bypass change.. I have one of the last (if not the last version) before the V2. just wondering the diff.. Thanks
 
OCD V2 verses prev version?

I hadn’t realized they’d officially released a version 2, so haven’t had chance to try it! My 1.4 is standard on my board, and I don’t feel like the enhanced buffering/tweaks will make me try it - interested to hear from others though,


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Re: OCD V2 verses prev version?

I was under the impression that there were 4 OCD versions....no?

https://youtu.be/KB-zDdkkgJ4
As of 2009, yes. ;)

According to Fuller there were 7 small revisions mostly changing a few resistor or capacitor values, and clipping diodes from 1.1 to 1.7, then this is a decent change to v2.



Edit - no more YouTube embedding?

https://youtu.be/txHlJKghD0k
 
Re: OCD V2 verses prev version?

Not being familiar with the OCD at all (just never had a chance to try it), what is its tonal 'thing'?
 
Re: OCD V2 verses prev version?

'transparency' is probably the best tonal descriptor, or at least what it is going for.

speaking of which I like this little video Brian Wampler did on 'transparent' drive pedals

 
Re: OCD V2 verses prev version?

Wow, the OCD doesn't sound 'transparent' at all. It has more gain than I'd thought. But I think the term 'transparent' is a little misleading. I think most people tend to think that it just sounds like you aren't getting the sound from an overdrive pedal, as opposed to the amp.
 
Re: OCD V2 verses prev version?

As of 2009, yes. ;)

According to Fuller there were 7 small revisions mostly changing a few resistor or capacitor values, and clipping diodes from 1.1 to 1.7, then this is a decent change to v2.



Edit - no more YouTube embedding?

https://youtu.be/txHlJKghD0k


Now how come you can embed and I can't? :scratchch
 
Re: OCD V2 verses prev version?

Idk, sometimes it works and sometimes not. Sane with pictures

It’s the specific YouTube tags that aren’t working. The generic video tags (the filmstrip icon) are still working.
 
Re: OCD V2 verses prev version?

Hi,
First, I have a friend who has played in serious recording and touring bands his whole life, is semi retired, and his OCD, although not new, sounds great, terrific with a Strat, and an 18 watt Marshall combo. Hendrix studio tone great, think VooDoo Chile' (Slight Return) great!
So, I have a zillion pedals, not the OCD V2, BUT-I CAN speak to the new way of buffering he speaks of. I was grappling for a new chorus, and TC Electonics has one with "true bypass" or a much hyped "Super Buffer" switch inside the unit I could use to try either manually. Trim pot I think he called it.
So I tried the unit on true bypass and this new Super buffer, and the new buffer was just like plugging right into the amp, no other pedals around. In an 8 pedal pedalboard!!! Wow. So I tried a 1 year old in place Boss delay with a standard buffer in place of the chorus, no true bypass option, standard buffer, and it was dull in my pedal chain in comparison. I will bet you a dollar to a doughnut, that both of these "New Buffers" are almost the same. So my small piece of advice is to give this new buffer a serious seat at the table when deciding.
Steve Buffington
 
Back
Top