Each of those guitars cost as much as two PT cruisers
Pantera turning thrash metal into groove-oriented tough-guy posturing lead directly to nu metal and dealt a simultaneous death blow to thrash and death metal, the only two forms of metal that hadn't completely sold out yet in the U.S.
As someone who has lived in DFW for 21 years (but is fortunate enough to be moving back to Houston soon!), their effect has been doubly wretched on this metroplex. If I never see another opening band where both guitarists are playing Dimebag sigs, it'll be too soon.
.
As someone who has lived in DFW for 21 years (but is fortunate enough to be moving back to Houston soon!), their effect has been doubly wretched on this metroplex. If I never see another opening band where both guitarists are playing Dimebag sigs, it'll be too soon.
That pop-structure oversimplification (which death metal still hasn't recovered from) was a direct reaction to Pantera. Pantera sent the word out to all of metal that the way to "make it big" was to write dumb bouncy groove riffs with a tough guy attitude, and it poisoned death metal just as much as thrash metal. Even all of "technical" death metal mostly follows this trend, by putting the "shocking" dissonant chord on the upbeat in the exact same way that Pantera convinced all of the nu metal bands to do.I agree about thrash, although I think it was in the air and we could just as easily say grunge took all the oxygen just like it strangled hair metal. But death metal didn't die. It went through a bit of pop-structure oversimplification in the late 90s, and some bands jumped the shark, but early 2000s DM bounced back with its own character. I don't love most of that early aughts era of DM but there's still new stuff pushing the boundaries (more or less) 20+ years later. Whereas with thrash it's pretty much all retro acts.
That pop-structure oversimplification (which death metal still hasn't recovered from) was a direct reaction to Pantera. Pantera sent the word out to all of metal that the way to "make it big" was to write dumb bouncy groove riffs with a tough guy attitude, and it poisoned death metal just as much as thrash metal. Even all of "technical" death metal mostly follows this trend, by putting the "shocking" dissonant chord on the upbeat in the exact same way that Pantera convinced all of the nu metal bands to do.
That pop-structure oversimplification (which death metal still hasn't recovered from) was a direct reaction to Pantera. Pantera sent the word out to all of metal that the way to "make it big" was to write dumb bouncy groove riffs with a tough guy attitude, and it poisoned death metal just as much as thrash metal. Even all of "technical" death metal mostly follows this trend, by putting the "shocking" dissonant chord on the upbeat in the exact same way that Pantera convinced all of the nu metal bands to do.
"Cowboys from Hell" was a year before the black album. Pantera beat Metallica to the punch there, not vice-versa.Metallica was putting out catchy accessible tunes and hardcore bands were writing boneheaded tough guy stuff with dumbed-down thrash riffs when Pantera were still nobodies wearing spandex. The trends were there already, Pantera just capitalized on them. I think you're giving them too much credit/blame. But being from TX I'm sure you've had way more Pantera-derivative stuff inflicted on you than the rest of us, so it makes sense that even hints of it would grind your gears.
As far as death metal goes, that sounds like it's a matter of taste. Totally fair if you prefer the old school stuff and don't get into much after the early to mid 90s. 92-93 is when I started listening to DM so it's a golden era for me. My point is, a lot of different creative stuff has kept happening in death metal since then, so whether any of us likes it or not, it's not the case that it was killed off.
I'm not trying to heckle you, hope it doesn't come off that way. Just shooting the breeze.
"Cowboys from Hell" was a year before the black album. Pantera beat Metallica to the punch there, not vice-versa.
For me, death metal peaked in the '88-'92 era. Albums like the first two Deicide albums, first two Morbid Angel albums, and the first Incantation album were just magic. Everyone who came later seemed to miss the point -- hence why the early second wave black metal bands all disparaged the "jogging suit death metal" that had become the norm at that point, before *that* gained too much visibility and everyone forgot the point of it, too.
Eh, while MoP was clearly a shift to a mainstream direction, it's doing it in a very different way than Pantera did it. MoP was a vicious thrash band touring with Queensryche, seeing their success, and going "hey, let's throw in a lot of semi-prog bits to attach ourselves to that rocketship." It's ironic that you mention liking Opeth, who did pretty much the same thing to death metal. Selling out by throwing in some cheap prog (and Metallica were far from the only culprits there -- Iron Maiden were damn near as bad about that starting on "Somewhere in Time") wasn't nearly as harmful as the tough-guy bounce-core that Pantera made.