Push-Push Versus Push-Pull Pots

Re: Push-Push Versus Push-Pull Pots

push/push is easier to use in some cases.. I have a push/push and a push/pull on my dk-2.. push/push for the master volume/volume bypass and a push/pull for the n+m volume /neck always-on

in retrospect.. i should of reversed the arrangement and used the push/push for the n+m volume and the push/pull for the master volume.. when I play, sometimes my hand hits the volume hard enough to activate the push/push..

advantage/disadvantage really depends on how you choose to use them and where IMO..i prefer the push/push but as i mentioned above, they arnt the best solution in some cases
 
Re: Push-Push Versus Push-Pull Pots

Generally push-push is a little easier for switching on the fly. However, push-pull provides a good visual representation of what setting you have activated.
 
Re: Push-Push Versus Push-Pull Pots

What about durability? I was told the push-push (which I like better for the moment) is more likly to wear off in time and cause problems... True?
 
Re: Push-Push Versus Push-Pull Pots

I haven't had any problems with a push-pull yet. The ones I've used have been the Allparts or similar. I put them in the tone location to keep them out of the way. (Also, because I don't want to solder thirty wires to them.) Even then, they can get in the way of a vintage Strat arm.
 
Last edited:
Re: Push-Push Versus Push-Pull Pots

I have mid-Eighties Ibanez push-push pots that still work.
 
Re: Push-Push Versus Push-Pull Pots

What about durability? I was told the push-push (which I like better for the moment) is more likly to wear off in time and cause problems... True?
The push-push is more complex from a mechanical standpoint and that's never good for reliability. In practice, I'd expect a good switch to last a long time in a guitar application unless you're just banging on the thing. If it's good for 100K cycles, how long would you go before hitting that count?
 
Re: Push-Push Versus Push-Pull Pots

The push-push is more complex from a mechanical standpoint and that's never good for reliability. In practice, I'd expect a good switch to last a long time in a guitar application unless you're just banging on the thing. If it's good for 100K cycles, how long would you go before hitting that count?

I need a pair to chose between the two coils of a humbucker plus the series/paralel modes. (It's a HSS Strat) I believe that I'll be pressing them more often at the start as the PU is new and less later on when I learn the sounds better. I also think to add a "fast lane" button for a quick jump to the full humbucking bridge mode from any of the combinations.
 
Re: Push-Push Versus Push-Pull Pots

I don't know if this true for all push-push pots, but I bought a guitar that had one installed, and in the second position, the knob pops up, like the "pull" position of a push-pull pot.

So in terms of visual indication, for that guitar, at least, push-push is equal to push-pull.

From that guitar alone, I prefer push-push, since I can just bang on the pot with my closed picking hand to yield the second position. With a push-pull pot, I have to uncurl some fingers to pull up the knob, which is more complicated.
 
Re: Push-Push Versus Push-Pull Pots

Push push are more convenient but currently nobody makes them to proper high quality, IMHO.
 
Re: Push-Push Versus Push-Pull Pots

I remember reading comments here that push-pulls were more reliable than push-push switches.
So I went with push-pulls and haven't really thought about this, but I've had to replace push-pull pots 3 times in 10 years.
Which in guitar universe, is crap reliability.

Just FYI. I guess I'll try push-push next time.
 
Re: Push-Push Versus Push-Pull Pots

In the 90's,I fitted a lot of Yamaha push/push pots. They were MIJ and were strong and reliable. Plus they were the only ones I could source locally. (No internet in the olden days,sonny.....). They were tiny,so you could fit them into just about any situation.
The only problem I ever found with push/pull pots,was some clients with guitars like Strats with push on knobs would get over enthusiastic and pull the knob straight off the pot shaft. And you don't want to get stranded on stage with your knob in your hand!

Cheers PJ
 
Re: Push-Push Versus Push-Pull Pots

push-pull provides a good visual representation of what setting you have activated.


+1. You can look at push-pull(s) and know what's on or off; that's a big benefit on stage. For that reason, I wouldn't want to own a push-push.
 
Re: Push-Push Versus Push-Pull Pots

I've used Push-Push pots off an on for years. The problem with them is that because it is spring loaded and you have to push it down to engage it, it means that your knob has to be mounted higher off the body, even in the "down" position, to allow this extra travel. So the knob is already high off the body, and then when it's in the "up" position, the know is really high off the body. That's probably okay if it's a little plastic Strat knob. For me, I use tall barrel knobs and witchhat knobs, so they end up sticking up way to high and looking stupid. I recently ordered some Push-Pull pots and am not looking back.
 
Re: Push-Push Versus Push-Pull Pots

I've never even heard of Push-Push. Well, excluding the Cinderella song.

Making sure your Push-Pull knob grips well is a good idea. I have a B.C. Rich Contour Mockingbird with a knurled barrel tone knob for single-coil tones and the grip is suspect.
 
Re: Push-Push Versus Push-Pull Pots

I had a push-push on one guitar after having used push-pull on everything else for years. I forgot it was a push-push, so saw that it was Down, and pulled Up on it. Pulled the shaft right out.

They're definitely easier to operate while playing a song, and the travel distance isn't all that much so you're not going to have massive clearance between the knob and the surface.
 
Back
Top