Quality gear... who knew?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Quality gear... who knew?

There are some new names in this thread.

There's also the principle of the thing. If I'm dissuaded by insults, such as the picture above, then the terrorists will have won.

Terrorists? What terrorists? Is this a warzone now?
 
Re: Quality gear... who knew?

My expectation is that more expensive guitars on the whole should be better set up and require less (ideally no) upgrading to be great instruments. They should be well made of choice woods. Picking up a random expensive brand guitar you should get more consistent, better playing guitars right off the shelf. Because they use better quality components and should be assembled with more care, they should tend to have better longevity overall. This isn't always the case (and I've seen exceptions), but by and large in my experience quality guitars live up to this.

Cheap stuff tends to be more variable. Quality control is spottier. Maybe you can find a great one, but you'll probably find a few dogs in the group. Finish quality and components tend to be selected to a price point. Can they sound and play great? Sure! But you'll often have to work harder to get them there. I've played a lot of cheap older guitars from the 70s and 60s and some of the inexpensive stuff being made today, and even the very low pirce stuff today is light years better than the old crap. Chinese labour and industry standard automated practices have really been a boon to the low priced stuff.

My 13 year old Epi Dot hangs in there in awesomeness with my US made Charvel, and they both make me happy. The Dot needed more work to get to that point though.
 
Re: Quality gear... who knew?

I do not remember ever seeing the words "quality" and "vintage" used interchangeably in this thread or any others.

Well yeah you don't see the word "vintage" because the word "quality" has come to replace it.

However, I have to mention this since you keep bringing it up: your zinc versus steel argument has no merit. Zinc is a very soft metal. You will notice on some "vintage" Gibson Les Pauls (for example) they used zinc for the bridge and saddles. Over time these bridges begin to "smile" and the saddle slots begin to sink. Why? Tension and friction are not friends of soft metals. Replace those bridges and saddles with steel and this problem is no longer an issue. The same can be said for any guitar with zinc saddles or bridge parts. Over time the saddle slots will sink and the zinc parts with tension on them will warp. That is just a fact. Does zinc seem as high quality as steel when you consider these factors? Probably not.

"no merit"? I'll admit I wasn't aware of the buckling Tune-o-Matic issue, but Strat bridges won't have this issue, neither will the Gibson style stop tail (and if it did it wouldn't matter), but even still, an issue which may or may not arise until many decades from now isn't going to make a 'night and day' difference in the playability right now. Then there's the cost versus benefit, suppose it takes twenty years for buckling to manifest, it looks like the zinc Tune-o-Matic can be had for about $13, where as the more costly ones cost closer to $60 (metal not specified), it would take sixty to eighty years for the stronger metal part to pay for itself - in this one limited case. The point has far more merit than not.
 
Re: Quality gear... who knew?

My expectation is that more expensive guitars on the whole should be better set up and require less (ideally no) upgrading to be great instruments. They should be well made of choice woods. Picking up a random expensive brand guitar you should get more consistent, better playing guitars right off the shelf. Because they use better quality components and should be assembled with more care, they should tend to have better longevity overall. This isn't always the case (and I've seen exceptions), but by and large in my experience quality guitars live up to this.

Cheap stuff tends to be more variable. Quality control is spottier. Maybe you can find a great one, but you'll probably find a few dogs in the group. Finish quality and components tend to be selected to a price point. Can they sound and play great? Sure! But you'll often have to work harder to get them there. I've played a lot of cheap older guitars from the 70s and 60s and some of the inexpensive stuff being made today, and even the very low pirce stuff today is light years better than the old crap. Chinese labour and industry standard automated practices have really been a boon to the low priced stuff.

My 13 year old Epi Dot hangs in there in awesomeness with my US made Charvel, and they both make me happy. The Dot needed more work to get to that point though.

There's a lot of opinion-based value judgements made: "to be great instruments", "well made of choice woods", "more consistent, better playing", "better quality components", it's just not the same as saying "these tires have better grip" "these tires result in better fuel economy", where the qualitative differences are real and measurable. As far as longevity, I guess if you have a tune-o-matic it will bend over the course of many years, but otherwise any guitar will wear out due to wear and tear. All three of my MIA's have had fret work done. IMO, all domestic electrics should have steel frets for the price point, that would matter. I'd bet that the reason cheap guitars seem to wear out quicker is because people, knowing they're cheap, willfully neglect them, and come to conflate a lack of durability with their own mistreatment of the guitar.
 
Re: Quality gear... who knew?

What of the benefits, though? The truth of the matter is that most of the concrete differences between budget and premium end guitars are matters of preference and aesthetics, such as nicer looking grains, nitro finish, steel metal parts, cloth hookup wire, niceties that don't directly effect the playability of the instrument, but that's at odds with a post like OPs that speak up the playability of a premium guitar when all the real actual benefits are largely symbolic or cosmetic. The tolerances in guitar manufacture have become so close over the years that you don't require a luthier made guitar to acquire precision in fret setting, neck straightness, evenness in curvature, nut notches, etc. The bottom line is that OP might not have liked his few cheap guitars, but they are not representative of all cheap guitars, and it wasn't necessary to seek out an MIA in order to have a guitar that overcomes those particular shortcomings.

Like I said, 90% of the cost to get that last 5%.
 
Re: Quality gear... who knew?

Can the mods start to enforce some sort of temporary draconian rules/punishments? This is seriously becoming way too common of an occurrence. There isn't a word in the English language to describe how stupid this flustercluck is.
 
Re: Quality gear... who knew?

Well then I guess all the upgrades on my IMPORT strat copy have been moot! I guess the stock ceramic bar magnet single coils aren't as ****ty as I remember! All because Drex says they didn't need to be upgraded!

The arguments of nitro vs poly has nothing to do with the debate... That is a touchy subject that has believers on both sides. However there is almost no argument on the quality of budget vs high end guitars... sure with a good setup and pickup adjustment you can get an affinity squier to sound and play pretty good stock. But you'll soon realize after playing a MIA strat that there is no comparison. Sure you can upgrade the squier but in the end it's still a squier.... not bashing squier it's just the truth. It's like buying a Ford pinto... it's cheap and gets the job done. sure you can make it faster, paint it, handle better etc but in the end you're still left with a pinto... however when you see a brand spanking new mustang you're gonna wonder why you even bothered with the pinto when the mustang already has everything you want. It's fast, looks good, handles great and to boot it's somewhat affordable... That is essentially what the OP was pointing out... except in relation to guitars of course.

As someone that has owned two Mustangs (a 2008 and a 2012), a Pinto wasn't meant to be a cheaper Mustang. It was meant to be a cheaper *car*. (No, I never owned a Pinto, but an uncle of mine lived with us for a while in the early 80s and was always buying Chevy Vegas for $100 a pop and running them into the ground. A Vega wasn't a cheaper Camaro. It was in the same class as the Pinto.)

A Squier Strat is meant to be a cheaper Strat. If you get a decent Squier (and it's hard to say that the newer CVs aren't), it's only a few steps to get to it being as nice as an MIA, for less than half the price.
 
Last edited:
Re: Quality gear... who knew?

IMO, all domestic electrics should have steel frets for the price point, that would matter. I'd bet that the reason cheap guitars seem to wear out quicker is because people, knowing they're cheap, willfully neglect them, and come to conflate a lack of durability with their own mistreatment of the guitar.

I've actually found the opposite on lots of occasions. People bought the imports because they were cheap, ended up not playing them (could be just kids that lost interest) and sold them, and they're still in great condition.
 
Re: Quality gear... who knew?

Can the mods start to enforce some sort of temporary draconian rules/punishments? This is seriously becoming way too common of an occurrence. There isn't a word in the English language to describe how stupid this flustercluck is.

Ban people with unpopular opinions? Give a pass to the people who can't simply ignore them?
 
Re: Quality gear... who knew?

As someone that has owned two Mustangs (a 2008 and a 2012), a Pinto wasn't meant to be a cheaper Mustang. It was meant to be a cheaper *car*.

A Squier Strat is meant to be a cheaper Strat. If you get a decent Squier (and it's hard to say that the newer CVs aren't), it's only a few steps to get to it being as nice as an MIA, for less than half the price.

You may have missed my point... the point was the initial quality of the cheap vehicle was lacking so you change it to suit your needs... and with the high end vehicle that already has all the options you want you don't have to...
 
Last edited:
Re: Quality gear... who knew?

I've actually found the opposite on lots of occasions. People bought the imports because they were cheap, ended up not playing them (could be just kids that lost interest) and sold them, and they're still in great condition.

I've seen that too, but my MIAs and imports have taken damage at exactly the same rate, they both dent as easily, the frets wear out as easily, they rust as quickly, the jacks have problems as often, etc. In fact the nitro seems to discolor more readily than the poly, which you'd think would be undesirable. I really can't find any point of particular durability with the domestics, aside from aforementioned zinc tune-o-matics, which I suppose will require some addressing later in the century.
 
Last edited:
Re: Quality gear... who knew?

Ban people with unpopular opinions? Give a pass to the people who can't simply ignore them?

Unpopular opinion =/= being a nuisance to the forum. Otherwise a certain beloved bicyclist would've been banned a long time ago.
 
Re: Quality gear... who knew?

Maybe in your opinion, I just learned about buckling tune-o-matic bridges. I'm already better off for having participated in this thread. I can't speak for anyone else though, you reap what you sew.
 
Re: Quality gear... who knew?

I think the real shame here is we have a respected forum brother JB_From_Hell who bought a guitar and liked it so much he felt like sharing his joy with us here at SDUGF. He made a simple post and shared his thoughts on it as many of us do with our NGD threads. In doing so, somehow, this particular thread opened a very unintended can of worms to the point where many people may shy away from posting their thoughts and opinions when they buy new equipment in the future out of fear their thread will get derailed, hijacked or get accused of starting a controversial thread just for being happy with their new purchase. That should never, ever happen. We should be happy for each other on NGD posts/threads. This is a real shame to the SDUGF community and will surely make this place a little less active in the future if this kind of behavior continues.
 
Re: Quality gear... who knew?

This is a real shame to the SDUGF community and will surely make this place a little less active in the future if this kind of behavior continues.

The ironic thing is the typical NGD post gets maybe to two pages before it succumbs to "Page 2" death, we're at page 9.
 
Re: Quality gear... who knew?

[snip]

There's also the principle of the thing. If I'm dissuaded by insults, such as the picture above, then the terrorists will have won.

What the???

Terrorists??? Seriously... are we short on meds this week???
 
Re: Quality gear... who knew?

9 pages that could be condensed to about three posts, TBH.

This is a pointless debate anyway, people who are likely to buy imports are going to buy imports, people who are likely to shy away from them will shy away from them. Both have a place in the hierarchy of musical instruments, I don't think anyone is denying that, they just fit in different places. Personally, I own a lot of import stuff, some with upgrades, some without. I own them because I can't really afford to buy higher priced stuff and I can gig with the imports without being unhappy. That being said, you better believe that I would rather be playing domestic products and would be if I had the funds to afford them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top