Quarter sawn is more stable over flat sawn and is less likely to warp but it costs more to produce it. Here is a pretty good picture showing both side by side.
http://albertobolocanmusic.blogspot.com/2011/03/maple-neck-wood.html
I would absolutely love to put Gil or anyone else to a blind listen test for a flat sawn vs quarter sawn neck or even one of his special sorta flat sorta quarter necks.
Its purely a structural thing... not tone... anyone saying anything else is seriously drinking the cool aid.
Its purely a structural thing... not tone... anyone saying anything else is seriously drinking the cool aid.
Oh look, another expert who has spoken and so the issue is resolved. Another expert who is probably going to tell me i don't have Eric Johnson's ears, am not a professional therefore i don't know what i'm talking about.
Quartersawn necks sound noticeably different, particularly on Strats and Teles. If you can't hear it, perhaps you should allow space in your mouthing off for those with decades of experience who can.
Thanks.
Actually, no. The structural factor contributes to a tonal difference.... Try a tap test on a QS vs a FS neck. The times I've done it, the FS has had a better tonal response most of the time. It could just be MY wood but it was there.
I have to agree with Crusty on whether there's a difference. Quartersawn sounds a little more tight/plinky to me. I'm not saying that's a bad thing at all, just my perception.
So if I hand you 2 guitars 1 with a quarter sawn neck and 1 without you can tell the difference? Without looking at the neck?
Oh come on!
I've got almost 38 years under my belt and I own multiple examples of both. Do you? I know my perceptions on the subject. You don't have to beat your chest to try to prove you're right.
And AGAIN I invite you to do a blind listen test. But I know you wont cause you know what you hear and have nothing to prove right?
That's right, I know what i hear. If you and others can't hear sonic differences when you make these all-encompassing, all-knowing statements, you probably haven't developed your hearing to a sufficient degree yet. It is a lifetime's process, and for a while i have at least been able to hear things that i once would never have believed existed. It is very clear from the amount of internet experts that what they read is more valuable than the experiences of those who have travelled the path and been exposed to many things enough times to be able to detect the differences between subtleties.
Most people can hear. But listening is a skill that takes time to develop ... a lifetime, i suspect.
And you are correct, i have nothing to prove ... some people can hear the differences, some can't. But to make public statements like this ...
" Its purely a structural thing... not tone... anyone saying anything else is seriously drinking the cool aid. "
well, i don't really need to say anymore, so i won't.
Define "better" and is any difference you hear attributable to the grain direction or just being a different piece of wood.
So if I hand you 2 guitars 1 with a quarter sawn neck and 1 without you can tell the difference? Without looking at the neck?