beaubrummels
Well-known member
Re: Question on tube types. Wing C SED EL34 to replace stock tubes
I was reading up on the history of the 6CA7 and I’m starting to think the term ‘beam pentode’ may have came about to disguise the fact that the early Tung-Sol and Sylvania/GE 6CA7 was actually a true pentode with a suppressor grid, but had a beam power anode plate (which wrapped around and hid all the internals), possibly trying to get around the Philips pentode patent (marketing, as JMP pointed out). The 6CA7 was designed to be a drop in replacement for the EL34, as a cheaper domestic alternative and avoid the cost of import at the time.
Sometimes tubes with beam forming plates are called beam pentodes, instead of beam tetrodes or in Europe kinkless tetrodes. This is because the beam forming plates perform the essentially same function that a suppressor grid performs.
Strictly speaking a tube should have a suppressor grid to be a pentode. The suppressor grid is the 5th element. I guess we could stretch the definition a bit to say that beam forming plates are a 5th element as well. But this also why there is so much confusion about what is a pentode and what is beam tetrode.
They don't sound exactly the same. Beam tetrodes have more open mids, and pentodes have more dense mids.
I was reading up on the history of the 6CA7 and I’m starting to think the term ‘beam pentode’ may have came about to disguise the fact that the early Tung-Sol and Sylvania/GE 6CA7 was actually a true pentode with a suppressor grid, but had a beam power anode plate (which wrapped around and hid all the internals), possibly trying to get around the Philips pentode patent (marketing, as JMP pointed out). The 6CA7 was designed to be a drop in replacement for the EL34, as a cheaper domestic alternative and avoid the cost of import at the time.