real quick.....anything look wrong w/ this les paul?

[blakejcan]

I have a couple more pics and the serial number checks out as 2009. Stamped 2009. Looks to me like a Trad Pro?

 

[Masta' C]

Re: real quick.....anything look wrong w/ this les paul?

Could you post a smaller picture? (sarcasm)

 

[blakejcan]

Re: real quick.....anything look wrong w/ this les paul?

probably

 

[blakejcan]

Re: real quick.....anything look wrong w/ this les paul?

 

[FuseG4]

Re: real quick.....anything look wrong w/ this les paul?

It looks like the ones I remember especially that color of binding

 

[blakejcan]

Re: real quick.....anything look wrong w/ this les paul?

phew. Cause I just bought it and the amp.

 

[blakejcan]

Re: real quick.....anything look wrong w/ this les paul?

Now.........is it a classic, traditional, traditional pro? Can I tell by the serial number?

Purty sure it ain't a standard.

 

[AlexR]

Re: real quick.....anything look wrong w/ this les paul?

Gibson knows what guitar belongs to that ser#

 

[Mincer]

Re: real quick.....anything look wrong w/ this les paul?

phew. Cause I just bought it and the amp.

You are supposed to do research before you buy.

 

[Demanic]

Re: real quick.....anything look wrong w/ this les paul?

+1
Unless you feel like gambling.

Sent from my Alcatel_5044C using Tapatalk

 

[devastone]

Re: real quick.....anything look wrong w/ this les paul?

Looks like a dirty classic, nice guitars, well, after they are cleaned up a bit.

 

[dystrust]

Re: real quick.....anything look wrong w/ this les paul?

Looks like a dirty classic, nice guitars, well, after they are cleaned up a bit.

Don't most Classics after '93-95 or so have those ugly green inlays? Or did they stop doing that?

The tuners look like locking Grover Rotomatics which were standard equipment on LP Standards IIRC.

 

[devastone]

Re: real quick.....anything look wrong w/ this les paul?

I'm not a Gibson-ologist, I thought the inlays looked like the green ones, that's why I thought it was a Classic. As always, I could be wrong, it happens a lot I'm told.

 

[PFDarkside]

Re: real quick.....anything look wrong w/ this les paul?

+1
Unless you feel like gambling.

Sent from my Alcatel_5044C using Tapatalk

I tell you, I’m your man...
You win some, lose some, all the same to me!

 

[blakejcan]

Re: real quick.....anything look wrong w/ this les paul?

yea I just went for it. kinda dumb, kinda fun.

Got it home. Has push-pull volumes & grovers. My Trad Pro II is definitely heavier. Plays great.

Will pull apart the rest to see what's there but I'm guessing a Traditional something.

 

[Masta' C]

Re: real quick.....anything look wrong w/ this les paul?

Yup, sometimes you just gotta stop worrying about the temperature of the water and take the plunge!

 

[metlking]

Re: real quick.....anything look wrong w/ this les paul?

Looks like a Trad Pro to me. I had a black one. Locking tuners, satin back, push/pull pots, zebra Burstbucker 3 bridge/Classic 57 neck, darker creme plastics/binding.

Great bang for the buck!

 

[Empty Pockets]

Re: real quick.....anything look wrong w/ this les paul?

It's a traditional pro

 

[JamesPaul]

Re: real quick.....anything look wrong w/ this les paul?

It looks really dusty.

 

[blakejcan]

Re: real quick.....anything look wrong w/ this les paul?

Gibson confirmed it's a 2009 Trad Pro. Gonna clean it up and see what can happen with it. Everything works and plays great. Couple dings & dents and a spot where the binding is cracking the tiniest bit. Other than that pretty sweet. I have another Trad Pro that I like better but will prob flip this guy and go have fun with the AC15CC1 that came with it.

and yes, it is crazy dusty and dirty