N nognow New member Apr 23, 2017 #1 I LOVE schaller M6 tuners, but their numbering system is weird. what does M6 90°, M6 135°, M6 180° mean?
I LOVE schaller M6 tuners, but their numbering system is weird. what does M6 90°, M6 135°, M6 180° mean?
A AlexR New member Apr 23, 2017 #2 Re: schaller M6 WTF numbering system Have you looked at pics of the various tuners to see if there are any physical differences. Thats usually the first thing I do.
Re: schaller M6 WTF numbering system Have you looked at pics of the various tuners to see if there are any physical differences. Thats usually the first thing I do.
Sirion Well-known member Apr 23, 2017 #3 Re: schaller M6 WTF numbering system That is obviously the angle of the "wing" the screw fastening the tuner is attached in relations to the tuning peg itself: 90°: 135°: 180°: 135° would be the "classic" Schaller.
Re: schaller M6 WTF numbering system That is obviously the angle of the "wing" the screw fastening the tuner is attached in relations to the tuning peg itself: 90°: 135°: 180°: 135° would be the "classic" Schaller.
A AlexR New member Apr 23, 2017 #4 Re: schaller M6 WTF numbering system ^ Damn, I was trying to get our OP to do the least bit of proactive thinking on his own behalf. Many of these threads needn't exist if people would just use a bit of initiative and commonsense.
Re: schaller M6 WTF numbering system ^ Damn, I was trying to get our OP to do the least bit of proactive thinking on his own behalf. Many of these threads needn't exist if people would just use a bit of initiative and commonsense.
N nognow New member Apr 24, 2017 #5 Re: schaller M6 WTF numbering system Sirion said: That is obviously the angle of the "wing" the screw fastening the tuner is attached in relations to the tuning peg itself: 90°: 135°: 180°: 135° would be the "classic" Schaller. Click to expand... hahah I cant believe I didn't catch that Thanks!
Re: schaller M6 WTF numbering system Sirion said: That is obviously the angle of the "wing" the screw fastening the tuner is attached in relations to the tuning peg itself: 90°: 135°: 180°: 135° would be the "classic" Schaller. Click to expand... hahah I cant believe I didn't catch that Thanks!
Sirion Well-known member Apr 24, 2017 #6 Re: schaller M6 WTF numbering system AlexR said: ^ Damn, I was trying to get our OP to do the least bit of proactive thinking on his own behalf. Many of these threads needn't exist if people would just use a bit of initiative and commonsense. Click to expand... But we are talking about people online, Alex. Better to help them and move on – otherwise we'd get nowhere.
Re: schaller M6 WTF numbering system AlexR said: ^ Damn, I was trying to get our OP to do the least bit of proactive thinking on his own behalf. Many of these threads needn't exist if people would just use a bit of initiative and commonsense. Click to expand... But we are talking about people online, Alex. Better to help them and move on – otherwise we'd get nowhere.
A AlexR New member Apr 24, 2017 #7 Re: schaller M6 WTF numbering system True. Maybe I'm overly optimistic about people's ability to learn to think and reason for themselves.
Re: schaller M6 WTF numbering system True. Maybe I'm overly optimistic about people's ability to learn to think and reason for themselves.
Sirion Well-known member Apr 24, 2017 #8 Re: schaller M6 WTF numbering system You have faith in man. That is a good thing.
LtKojak New member Apr 24, 2017 #9 Re: schaller M6 WTF numbering system AlexR said: I'm overly optimistic about people's ability to learn to think and reason for themselves. Click to expand... Oh, man... you're REALLY setting yourself for eternal disappointment. Example: an over 50 year-old guy, owner of two R9s posts asking the MLP Forum the following: "I broke the 1st string. Can I only change that or do I need to change the whole set? I don't like changing strings, you know? Difficult to keep your belief in the human race up after things like that, isn't it? Your Honor, I rest my case! Last edited: Apr 24, 2017
Re: schaller M6 WTF numbering system AlexR said: I'm overly optimistic about people's ability to learn to think and reason for themselves. Click to expand... Oh, man... you're REALLY setting yourself for eternal disappointment. Example: an over 50 year-old guy, owner of two R9s posts asking the MLP Forum the following: "I broke the 1st string. Can I only change that or do I need to change the whole set? I don't like changing strings, you know? Difficult to keep your belief in the human race up after things like that, isn't it? Your Honor, I rest my case!