Seymour Duncan SH1 in Tele neck?

Lazy8

New member
If I put a SD SH1 '59 humbucker in the neck of a MIM ash body Tele (the one with the reverse control plate) is it going to sound too dark?
 
Re: Seymour Duncan SH1 in Tele neck?

Nope, I actually prefer the '59 in Fender's. Depending on what you have in the bridge you might have to mess around with electrical values. What do you plan on pairing it with?
 
Re: Seymour Duncan SH1 in Tele neck?

Stock pickup in the bridge, I think it's a little bit hotter than a standard tele bridge pickup and I like it. Do I need to change pots or something?
 
Re: Seymour Duncan SH1 in Tele neck?

Any of the vintage output neck models will do nicely, including the butt-ugly Sentient. ;)

It just depends on what you want.

Full Shred Neck and Jazz would be my first choices from SD. Throw a cover on the Full Shred and put slotted screws in the neck-facing coil if the aesthetics bother you. DiMarzio options are a bit more exciting: EJ Custom (neck or bridge), Bluesbucker (series/parallel switching), and The Humbucker From Hell.
 
Last edited:
Re: Seymour Duncan SH1 in Tele neck?

Stock pickup in the bridge, I think it's a little bit hotter than a standard tele bridge pickup and I like it. Do I need to change pots or something?
Depends. Do you intend to roll the tone down on the neck pickup?
 
Re: Seymour Duncan SH1 in Tele neck?

The 59 in the neck of a Tele (ash or alder) is a great choice. It won't be dark at all.
 
Re: Seymour Duncan SH1 in Tele neck?

I've got a '59 in the neck of my Tele. Sounds good. Plays nice with the Antiquity in the bridge, but I think I'm going to swap that out for a Hot Rails for Tele.
 
Re: Seymour Duncan SH1 in Tele neck?

Perfect! So I would hook the tone control directly to bridge pickup at the selector switch and keep your pots as they are at 250k.
 
Re: Seymour Duncan SH1 in Tele neck?

I have a 59 with an A2 in my tele and couldn’t be happier. I do have 500k pots.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Re: Seymour Duncan SH1 in Tele neck?

I have a 59 with an A2 in my tele and couldn’t be happier. I do have 500k pots.
With an A2 in the 59 I would have said:

500k master volume and 500k master tone; bridge loaded with a 270k resistor

-or-​

500k master volume and 1M* master tone; bridge loaded with a 200k resistor

-or-​

500k master volume and 250k tone connected to the bridge; bridge loaded with a 510k resistor​


(*) definitely audio taper.
 
Last edited:
Re: Seymour Duncan SH1 in Tele neck?

Perfect! So I would hook the tone control directly to bridge pickup at the selector switch and keep your pots as they are at 250k.

thats what i would do as well. 250k master volume, 250k tone on the bridge pup only
 
Re: Seymour Duncan SH1 in Tele neck?

correct. by wiring the tone to the bridge pup youll have a brighter neck pup which should be a good thing in your case. when the bridge pup is active either by itself or with the neck, the tone control will be active as well
 
Re: Seymour Duncan SH1 in Tele neck?

Having the tone control active when both pickups are selected together is generally a good thing, since the inductive loading on each pickup by the other pickup will drop the low end. The drop in mids and treble from the tone control being in circuit will help compensate.
 
Re: Seymour Duncan SH1 in Tele neck?

I've got a '59 in the neck of my Tele. Sounds good. Plays nice with the Antiquity in the bridge, but I think I'm going to swap that out for a Hot Rails for Tele.
I've heard great things about the Little '59 Tele.
 
Re: Seymour Duncan SH1 in Tele neck?

I had Nocaster bridge and '59n. The middle position is chimey. Very nice. Fender had this combo a few years ago.
 
Back
Top