blueman335
Mojo's Minions
Re: SG or Wildkat?
Look at videos of Eric Johnson playing and SRV. Regardless of genre, it's obvious that Johnson is a true master of the instrument.
I have hundreds of blues CDs, been to dozens of blues festivals. When you really get into blues, SRV doesn't stand out; he's in the middle of the pack. He's gotten the spotlight because of the record companies promoting him & all the airplay, that's a big part of it. Right image, right place at the right time, the public was tiring of new wave and disco; a raw bluesy performer was a nice change. The time was ripe. Some bluesy player was going to make it big at that time, but the public isn't that into the genre, so their limited interest and attention spans couldn't hold more than a few blues bands to listen to (like Robert Cray) before they moved on to something else. SRV's talent wasn't at the top of the list of things that propelled him to fame. Promotion and MTV played a big part. When you listen to a lot of blues, you find there's a bunch of very good players, most of which aren't well-known. To single out SRV is a stretch. In talking about blues with people, most of those that rave about SRV don't listen to much blues besides him. The long-term blues lovers that listen to a lot of blues, have other players they rave about.
But how do you judge one is better? There is no scale/metrics to determine it and people can argue for/against each set of artist comparisons. I'd like to see those knocking SRV pull off the live performances he did... Comparing guys like Satch or Malmsteen to SRV is not a good comparison IMO–completely different style of music. And plenty of people bash Satriani's and Malmsteen's playing.
Michael Phelps is a better swimmer and Usain Bolt is a better sprinter than I am–you can measure that by distance and time (both hold World Records.) Comparing musicians is extremely subjective...that's my whole point.
Look at videos of Eric Johnson playing and SRV. Regardless of genre, it's obvious that Johnson is a true master of the instrument.
I have hundreds of blues CDs, been to dozens of blues festivals. When you really get into blues, SRV doesn't stand out; he's in the middle of the pack. He's gotten the spotlight because of the record companies promoting him & all the airplay, that's a big part of it. Right image, right place at the right time, the public was tiring of new wave and disco; a raw bluesy performer was a nice change. The time was ripe. Some bluesy player was going to make it big at that time, but the public isn't that into the genre, so their limited interest and attention spans couldn't hold more than a few blues bands to listen to (like Robert Cray) before they moved on to something else. SRV's talent wasn't at the top of the list of things that propelled him to fame. Promotion and MTV played a big part. When you listen to a lot of blues, you find there's a bunch of very good players, most of which aren't well-known. To single out SRV is a stretch. In talking about blues with people, most of those that rave about SRV don't listen to much blues besides him. The long-term blues lovers that listen to a lot of blues, have other players they rave about.