To tell you the truth I don't care which mic it is as long as it's good. I know the SM57 and 58 are good mics it's just the 58 is supposed to just be a vocal mic I wondered if the 57 was noticeably better for recording instruments.ErikH said:If you want the 57, send it back. Otherwise, keep it. It's great mic and can be used for anything. I've used it to capture a garage jam session on tape with pretty decent results.
Well that's certainly reassuring, thanks. Also thanks Erik. If anybody else has anything to add fire away.these_go211 said:i thought they were basically the same mic except the 58 has the ball end and the 57 has the straight end. i was going to buy a 57 last year for vocals and recording acoustic guitar. i asked 2 friends, 1 who is a producer/engineer who owns his own studio and the other is a long time guitar player vocalist for their opninion on the 57. both, independently of one another, said i should buy a 58 instead. for what that's worth.......
Well I've never used a 57 this is my first mic so it seems I got a bargain saving an extra £10 on it.Zerberus said:Keep the 58 unless you specifically want teh exact tone and response of teh 57![]()
A highly effective, built-in, spherical filter minimizes wind and breath "pop" noise.
Well that sounds pretty useful as I will be recording some mouth organ as well. I found another difference the range of frequencies are 40-15000Hz for the 57, 50-15000 for the 58Wymore Guitars said:From Sure's website this appears to be the main difference for the SM 58:
A highly effective, built-in, spherical filter minimizes wind and breath "pop" noise.
Hey I just opened it and it looks like you could even screw on the 57 end if you could get one.Imp said:if you're being very careful, just unscrew the filter on the SM58.. it's a 57 for all intents and purposes then.. just be careful with the exposed end!!
tom