Signature Model Guitars...Yay or Nay?

Bogner

New member
Are you fans of signature model guitars? I know some are and some aren't. I think I would probably NOT buy a signature guitar if I wasn't a fan of the artist.

If you are a fan of signature model guitars, which ones do you like?

I really like the Knaggs Steve Stevens SS2 models although the SSC models are ok. I am also a fan of anything ESP and James Hetfield. The PRS Tremonti's (old versions with fat necks and fixed bridges) are awesome as well.
 
If the only difference between the signature model of guitar and one that is not signature but they are the same minus the signature, I see no need to purchase the signature model. I have an Iceman that was a reissue back in 94, I would never spend the money on the PS model of that guitar when for far less the difference between those two guitars, I could build my Iceman into the PS model.

For $160 I could make my Iceman a PS model minus his name, not worth the cost of the Sig model difference of about $400. I think I paid approx $800 for it new, think the PS models were going for $1200, so for the cost of 2 pickups and his name on it, naw, not gonna happen.
 
Last edited:
There's NO shame in getting a signature model. In many cases, you get finishes and features not available on standard production guitars of the same model for not a lot of money. In my experience, they also tend to have solid QC, as well.

Every guitarist dreams of playing their own "signature" model, but that's not realistic for 99% of us. :)
 
I'm a big fan of the Les Paul!

:smack:

There's always someone pulling out the "Les Paul" in threads about "signature" guitars

Gee, I have a Paul Reed Smith...does that mean I have a "signature" guitar? I mean, it literally has his "signature" on the headstock, so must be...right? :lmao:
 
They allow quirky differences in design that you can't get from a standard model. I don't like them when they are just the same model in a different color or a different pickup option. I really want to see the artist in the design. Like the St Vincent Music Man, the Belew Parker Fly or the 1st Blackmore Strat from Japan with 2 pickups and a set neck.
 
I'd buy a signature model if the features on it closely match what I'm looking for. I don't care at all about whether or not it has someone's sig on the headstock.

This exactly. I have one signature guitar, a John Mayer Strat. It’s basically the SRV V2, with more vintage style pickups a different neck carve and most importantly for me, a small signature on the back of the headstock so it really just looks like a Strat.

I do have an interest in the Clapton Strat, that’s got a pretty unique setup. Also the Slash AFD Les Paul is just an iconic look I want someday. It doesn’t have to be the AFD, but that distressed lemon burst is awesome.
 
Usually it's a no from me. But for example the only 7string Jackson with Warrior shape was the Dave Davidson sig model. And since like the guy's playing a lot and his sig model offered something I could only get from the Custom Shop otherwise it was a no brainer.
 
I'm all about unique gear, I have owned a few sig model stuff and it's always been great, but I've never bought a signature model just because I was a fan of that player.... Only because it either looked super, or had all the features I am looking for.
 
I will use a sig model if it has features I want/need. For example, the Pete Townshend SJ200 was the only production J-200 with a solid bridge when it came out, and it had an incredibly thin easy neck to play.
 
I'm pretty much in the same boat with everyone else. It's the guitar, not the sig, that I care about. For example, I love the Robert Cray Stratocaster. But it's because it's a hardtail. Not because of RC.
 
:smack:

There's always someone pulling out the "Les Paul" in threads about "signature" guitars

Gee, I have a Paul Reed Smith...does that mean I have a "signature" guitar? I mean, it literally has his "signature" on the headstock, so must be...right? :lmao:


not really

It was literally made as a signature model. Which is why they even tried to call the SG a Les Paul when their marketing department decided to get Les to play SGs and discontinue the "real" LPs.

Which, as we know, didn't exactly work out
 
There are a bunch of sig guitars I'd like to own... PRS DGT, J Mascis Jazzmaster, a JEM, the og black/green Universe, Geddy Lee J bass, Clapton Strat, Solar At The Gates baritone, Reverend Grag Koch and Reeves Gabrels... probably more.
 
As others have said, I’d get a signature guitar for the specs, not for the artist’s name. Like the Epiphone Jason Hook Explorer that came with Duncans looked good spec for the money, but I don’t know his work.
 
Not my thing, generally. Seems most are about slapping the artist's name on the guitar, which is the thing I hate most about signature guitars. If I ever had a signature guitar (will never happen), it wouldn't have my name on it. Just have them build it to your unique specs. People will still know its your signature guitar without a cheesy signature. That being said, I wouldn't let a signature stop me from buying one. However, I've yet to find a signature model guitar that I wanted to buy and couldn't get the desired results from elsewhere and at a cheaper price, but my tastes are pretty standard.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top