since opinions are just JUST OPNIONS tell me why you think duncans are

Re: since opinions are just JUST OPNIONS tell me why you think duncans are

The tone has already been discussed, but I'll bring up the materials quality.

Have you ever looked at a DiMarzio up close? You can't honestly say it looks equal to Duncan in quality. If you put those in an expensive guitar, they almost insult the instrument. The plastic they use looks like recycled two liter bottles!!! LOL
 
Re: since opinions are just JUST OPNIONS tell me why you think duncans are

I had a JB once..it was very solid built but not my thing for my Ibanez.

2 weeks ago, I´ve installed a Dmz Air Norton and Breed and I like the tone of it BUT the grouding cable was kinda fizzy...some of the wires just went out :duh: Perhaps I´ve cut a bit too much of the isolation but it was not stable at all and the JB made no problem...but it works, though.

Anyway..gotta try a Custom Custom next time :13:

At the end I can understand the quality issue with DiMarzio somehow.
 
Last edited:
Re: since opinions are just JUST OPNIONS tell me why you think duncans are

ranalli beat me to it... SD isn't really "better" than those other manufacturers, just "different".

I've had Antiquities in my old Gibson Les Paul Standard and wasn't pleased with them. They were warm, but the clarity wasn't quite there to my ears. I've played Dimarzio Virtual PAFs, Classic PAF and Virtual Vintage singles before. The singles I wasn't too impressed with, but their humbuckers did have that warm classic PAF tone with a bit hotter output and more clarity than most pickups.

I admit the build quality isn't exactly indestructible on Dimarzios, but the important thing is tone and the fact that once they are installed, they don't fall apart.

The beauty of pickups is just how much they can change your tone. There's so much out there for people to try. I currently own Wagner Custom Rewinds pups and Harmonic Design, so it goes to show I'll just go with whatever sounds the best in my particular instrument, not necessarily brand name.

Props to Seymour for having the best board around!
 
Re: since opinions are just JUST OPNIONS tell me why you think duncans are

Gearjoneser said:
The tone has already been discussed, but I'll bring up the materials quality.

Have you ever looked at a DiMarzio up close? You can't honestly say it looks equal to Duncan in quality. If you put those in an expensive guitar, they almost insult the instrument. The plastic they use looks like recycled two liter bottles!!! LOL



I find judgements like this kind of silly though because they work EXACTLY as designed. I've been using Dimarzios for years and I've never had any problems associated with build quality. I imagine many others have had the same experience.
 
Re: since opinions are just JUST OPNIONS tell me why you think duncans are

I've counted recently and found out that I am heavily a DiMarzio user. It's mostly due to the cosmetics, as they do more double row allen head screws which seem to work better cosmeticly with my RGs and Jacksons.

I also prefer the matte look of the bobbins compared to the glossy duncan ones. I think it helps them look better longer, as an example, I recently traded a 20 year old Pearly Gates for a 20 year old Super Distortion, and honestly, the SuperD looked much newer.

I like SD HotRails, as they have the most selection, and I am really liking my Full Shred.

It's what ever fits the Axe!
 
Re: since opinions are just JUST OPNIONS tell me why you think duncans are

I'm sure someone has said it already, but the best description I've heard is that SD's have a 3-dimensional tone, whereas the others a kind of 2-dimensional.

More natural, more of a classic tone.

Dimarzio makes great pickups for that bright, screaming, metal tone. Too bad I don't like that tone.

In all fairness, the Dimarzio designed s/c pups in my Nitefly are pretty cool. They're very responsive to tonal changes in the POD, making it a very versatile guitar.

But if I buy after market pickups, I'll go Duncan every time.
 
Re: since opinions are just JUST OPNIONS tell me why you think duncans are

Gearjoneser said:
Have you ever looked at a DiMarzio up close? You can't honestly say it looks equal to Duncan in quality. If you put those in an expensive guitar, they almost insult the instrument. The plastic they use looks like recycled two liter bottles!!! LOL
while this post is funny as hell i cant say i agree about them being all that cheap
i have NEVER had a dimarzio go bad
I was told that dimarzio uses the materials they do simply because the orignal super D back in the 70's was such a hit they felt it may be part of thier mojo
The virtual PAF's and blues bucker have the same components as duncan
shinny high grade plastic bobbins, nickle baseplate,better wire, and have a TOP QUALITY LOOK.
I dont know if you guys now this or not but back in the 70's early 80's
dimarzio was KING PIN for pup replacement
duncan was not as known or used
then guys like EDDIE VANHALEN,RANDY RHOADS(both of these guys used both dimarzio and duncans), started talking about using duncans in thier guitars and the rest is history
duncan did however do rewinds for guy before them like beck,hendrix,clapton,page but it was not in magazines so i went unnoticed
I mean blow by blow,wired has DUNCAN all over it and that record was released in the 70's :)
I can see why guys prefer duncans over others i just wanted to hear the different reasons
 
Re: since opinions are just JUST OPNIONS tell me why you think duncans are

WICKED LESTER said:
while this post is funny as hell i cant say i agree about them being all that cheap
i have NEVER had a dimarzio go bad
I was told that dimarzio uses the materials they do simply because the orignal super D back in the 70's was such a hit they felt it may be part of thier mojo
The virtual PAF's and blues bucker have the same components as duncan
shinny high grade plastic bobbins, nickle baseplate,better wire, and have a TOP QUALITY LOOK.
I dont know if you guys now this or not but back in the 70's early 80's
dimarzio was KING PIN for pup replacement
duncan was not as known or used
then guys like EDDIE VANHALEN,RANDY RHOADS(both of these guys used both dimarzio and duncans), started talking about using duncans in thier guitars and the rest is history
duncan did however do rewinds for guy before them like beck,hendrix,clapton,page but it was not in magazines so i went unnoticed
I mean blow by blow,wired has DUNCAN all over it and that record was released in the 70's :)
I can see why guys prefer duncans over others i just wanted to hear the different reasons

This makes me wonder, how many of those rewinds done back then by Seymour were done to a DiMarzio?
 
Re: since opinions are just JUST OPNIONS tell me why you think duncans are

ErikH said:
This makes me wonder, how many of those rewinds done back then by Seymour were done to a DiMarzio?

:laugh2: now that is funny!!!!!!!!!!!! :laugh2:
 
Re: since opinions are just JUST OPNIONS tell me why you think duncans are

Lewguitar said:
Dimarzios have that New York nasal thing to them...like the way the folks in the Bronx or Brooklyn talk! :laugh2: Kinda nasal, aggressive and pushy. (That's a joke, BTW! :) ) Lew


And i suppose Duncans are Dimarzio's British counterparts that has that hollow, flutey quality to them, like the way the folks in England talk (ex. Stewie from the Family Guy).... hollow and aggressive but slightly more sophisticated. hahahah... :dance: j/k
 
Back
Top