donaldr
New member
The STK-S7 is not compressed at all IMHO. It's the perfect continuity, sound and volume, from the STK-S4 neck (I don't have a middle pickup). It's a bright bridge pickup but less bright and with more body than a STK-S4 in the bridge.
I had a STK-S7 in the neck with a 250k pots and it was too dark IMHO. If you decide to have one I would definitely use 500k pots (don't know if you need both volume and tone 500k pots, you would have to experiment).
If you want the STK-S7, I agree with Christoper by having it in the neck with a STK-S4 in the middle for good quack in positions 2-4. But I never use positions 2-4 so don't quote me on this
I never had an SH11 so I cannot say if the STK-S4 neck would be a perfect match with the SH11 bridge. But according to specs, I would expect the STK-S4 to be brighter and lower output when switching from bridge to neck.
Since you want to order both for neck and middle, I would start with one or the other in the neck and nothing in the middle. Play a bit and decide if it's doing the job of not. If not then swap the neck for the other one.
I had a STK-S7 in the neck with a 250k pots and it was too dark IMHO. If you decide to have one I would definitely use 500k pots (don't know if you need both volume and tone 500k pots, you would have to experiment).
If you want the STK-S7, I agree with Christoper by having it in the neck with a STK-S4 in the middle for good quack in positions 2-4. But I never use positions 2-4 so don't quote me on this

I never had an SH11 so I cannot say if the STK-S4 neck would be a perfect match with the SH11 bridge. But according to specs, I would expect the STK-S4 to be brighter and lower output when switching from bridge to neck.
Since you want to order both for neck and middle, I would start with one or the other in the neck and nothing in the middle. Play a bit and decide if it's doing the job of not. If not then swap the neck for the other one.