So, I was messing around with my settings....

some_dude

Raging BB Gunologist
First off, before I started, I liked my tone. I figured I'd tweek things a bit, and that would be it.....

....boy, was I wrong.

After a four hour tweeking session, I ended up changing everything, and it sounds so much better now.

(For those that don't know, Mesa Recto Preamp -> Mesa 2:100 power amp -> Mesa Recto 4x12. The current settings were done with a Les Paul w/ EMG85(n) and 81(b), then tested again with a Strat w/DiMarzio Super Distortion(b) [my JB equipped Strat is on loan...])

The clean channel is now very warm with a hard, crunchy overdrive when the guitar's volume is maxed. It cleans up very nicely (much nicer than it did with my old settings) as you turn the guitar volume down, and will hit early 80s levels of gain at max volume. It reacts well to OD pedals.

(old/new)

Channel Voice - Brit / Fat
Gain - 13:00 / 11:15
Treb - 12:00 / 12:45
Mids - 10:00 / 10:45
Bass - 12:00 / 09:30
Pres - 12:00 / 09:30
Mast - 09:00 / 11:00

(The Fat channel voicing is voiced similar to the clean channel on the MkI preamp. It's a touch higher gain than the clean voice, with a slightly more bassy tone. I left the amps master volume at 15:15.)


Channel 2 is alot tighter sounding, with a heavy, chunky muting sound. With the old settings I sometimes found it to get the right feel with the palm mutes. I assumed it was due to excessive output from the EMGs, as I didn't have the same problem with my JB equipped guitar. I kept lowering the volume on the EMGs to tighten the mutes up, but then they lost some of the punch I was after. However, after dropping the gain and bass quite a bit they come out hard and near break your teeth. I also upped the mids a tad, which helped out too.

Oddly enough, this setting cleans up remarkably well. I actually get a good and very useful clean sound when I roll the guitar volume down to around 1 or 2. It's a touch fatter, and a little less brite than the cleans on the channel 1.

(old/new)

Channel Voice - Vintage / Vintage
Gain - 13:00 / 11:00
Treb - 12:00 / 12:00
Mids - 11:00 / 11:30
Bass - 12:00 / 10:00
Pres - 11:00 / 10:00
Mast - 12:30 / 10:45


Basically, I ended up tweeking everything for much more clarity and definition, and cut the overall gain for a tighter rhythm sound. With these new settings I need to rely on OD's to push me up to the levels of gain required for good high gain soloing. I did try to drop my guitar volume to 8 and set the rhythm gain for that volume (which would let me dime the guitars volume for solo boosts), but I found that compromised my rhythm tone slightly, and kept the amp from cleaning up as nicely....

....and since I'm predominantly a rhythm player, I'd rather sacrifice some lead tone than compromise on my rhythm tone.

/long post... :)
 
Re: So, I was messing around with my settings....

Thanx for the detailed review!
Can you make clips of these settings?
 
Re: So, I was messing around with my settings....

If thats the first time this has happened for you then be warned, it will happen again. Mesa gear is like that. Mesa stuff is very dynamic and touch sensitive and small tweaks here and there as well as dramatically changing your settings can yeild a wide variety of very cool tones. They are also very easy to dial in some not as desireable tones as well depending on your assumptions on how an amp should be dialed in.

I've had my Mesa rack now for almost four years and I still regularily find new and killer sounds in there.
 
Re: So, I was messing around with my settings....

TwilightOdyssey said:
Thanx for the detailed review!
Can you make clips of these settings?

I'll see what I can come up with over the next couple of days.


Robert S. said:
If thats the first time this has happened for you then be warned, it will happen again. Mesa gear is like that. Mesa stuff is very dynamic and touch sensitive and small tweaks here and there as well as dramatically changing your settings can yeild a wide variety of very cool tones. They are also very easy to dial in some not as desireable tones as well depending on your assumptions on how an amp should be dialed in.

I've had my Mesa rack now for almost four years and I still regularily find new and killer sounds in there.


It happened a few times after I first bought it, but this is by far the most drastic change to date.

I'm glad I finally dropped the gain on it however, as it's really added to the dynamics and sensitivity you mention.

As for assumptions on tone....when I first got it I did the treb 7, mids 10, bass 5 thing. I learned it wasn't a Marshall pretty fast.... :blackeye: :laugh2:
 
Re: So, I was messing around with my settings....

Ah yes...Finding new, killer settings always kicks ass! I used to have my XXX at bass - 10, mids - 5, treble - 6, gain - 10, on the ultra channel. I now use the crunch channel exclusively for rythm, with the settings at 7/10/9/6, soo much better.
 
Re: So, I was messing around with my settings....

screamingdaisy said:
I'll see what I can come up with over the next couple of days.

I can't get a good recording of these settings.

I don't own any mics or anything, so I record off the preamps recording outs.

The problem is a large chunk of the distortion is comming off the power amp and speakers, so it's pretty weak and sh*tty sounding when just using the preamp.....and the preamps internal cabinet simulation just plain sucks....

....in fact, I didn't realize how much of this new sound comes from the speakers/power amp until I tried to record it without them....

One of these days I'll start purchasing my own little amature recording setup. Two mics and a digital 4 track should be enough.
 
Re: So, I was messing around with my settings....

screamingdaisy said:
One of these days I'll start purchasing my own little amature recording setup. Two mics and a digital 4 track should be enough.
Even one Sure SM57 will do ...
 
Re: So, I was messing around with my settings....

The Triaxis has recording outs but I never use them alone, they don't sound very good compared to the amp and speakers. Direct boxes help a bit but you really need a direct box/cab simulator if you want to use Mesa recording outs.
 
Re: So, I was messing around with my settings....

ive always wanted to get one of those isolated speaker cabs so you could get a killer recorded tone without having too much volume outside the box.
ive seen a few different ones but they all seem pretty much the same
 
Re: So, I was messing around with my settings....

TwilightOdyssey said:
Even one Sure SM57 will do ...

Already in the works.... :wink:


Robert S. said:
The Triaxis has recording outs but I never use them alone, they don't sound very good compared to the amp and speakers. Direct boxes help a bit but you really need a direct box/cab simulator if you want to use Mesa recording outs.

I'm looking at taking a line feed off my Hotplate so that I get all the tone of the power amp in there too. I talked to Ed DeGenero (THD guy) and he told me I'd need a cab sim to make it sound right, as it's a raw feed, so I've started to do research into these products. What's a good place to start my research?


jeremy said:
ive always wanted to get one of those isolated speaker cabs so you could get a killer recorded tone without having too much volume outside the box.
ive seen a few different ones but they all seem pretty much the same

What do they cost? I have the luxery of blaring my 4x12 at full volume, but I can't do it all the time (only durring the day).
 
Re: So, I was messing around with my settings....

jeremy said:
ive always wanted to get one of those isolated speaker cabs so you could get a killer recorded tone without having too much volume outside the box. ive seen a few different ones but they all seem pretty much the same
Jeremy, I've used one of these in the studio before. Aside from the fact that most only use a 1x12, and the sound is very directional, they work great! Plus, you can put whatever mic you want inside the iso box.
 
Re: So, I was messing around with my settings....

TwilightOdyssey said:
Jeremy, I've used one of these in the studio before. Aside from the fact that most only use a 1x12, and the sound is very directional, they work great! Plus, you can put whatever mic you want inside the iso box.

What's the difference in tone between micing a 1x12 iso cab and one speaker in a 4x12?
 
Back
Top