BlueTalon
New member
Re: Speaking of Gotoh 201 bridges...
It means he loves the Fender original bent-metal bridges. That's fine, that's his preference. But the fact it that virtually all bridges made by reputable manufacturers represent better design and engineering than Fender's originals. There's no such thing as "too good." Heck, even Fender knows their bent metal bridges are bottom-of-the-line, which is why they offer better bridges on their higher end products. And Leo knew it too, which is why MusicMan and G&L have better engineered bridges.
Personally, I think it's criminal to leave bent-metal bridges on a bass you care about, but that's just me and my opinion. And even though they were originally designed the way they were for ease of manufacture, they still do work (though it's silly to claim they are in any way better than the better engineered alternatives). I just hate the cheap look of them, and it's worth it to me to put something better on my basses.
Not clear what "too good" means.
It means he loves the Fender original bent-metal bridges. That's fine, that's his preference. But the fact it that virtually all bridges made by reputable manufacturers represent better design and engineering than Fender's originals. There's no such thing as "too good." Heck, even Fender knows their bent metal bridges are bottom-of-the-line, which is why they offer better bridges on their higher end products. And Leo knew it too, which is why MusicMan and G&L have better engineered bridges.
Personally, I think it's criminal to leave bent-metal bridges on a bass you care about, but that's just me and my opinion. And even though they were originally designed the way they were for ease of manufacture, they still do work (though it's silly to claim they are in any way better than the better engineered alternatives). I just hate the cheap look of them, and it's worth it to me to put something better on my basses.
Last edited:








