I don't know the historical rationale for the design decision (ie, the 'why'), but it does make the bass strings bassier and the treble strings brighter when you're using the bridge pickup.
From what I remember it gave Leo the sound he wanted.
Don't be fooled though, Gibsons, Hamers, PRSi, and lots of other guitars achieve the same thing, but do it by setting the bridge in at an angle.
Luke
Actually the angling of Tune-O-Matics and stop bar bridges is to achieve correct intonation and not for tonal reasons![]()
the angling of the bridge pickup was done to warm upo the bass strings while still keeping the sparkle and brilliance on the high strings. IMO it would have been better the other way around, but it was Leo´s design and not mine.
Sound-wise, this is how Leo should have slanted the bridge PU, but the visual lines don't flow as well with the pickguard. Tone lost out to looks.
And having only one 250K volume pot with no tone pot, that SC bridge is treble on top of treble.
From what I know, it's to match the string spacing.
why? cuz it'z kewl:smokin:
honestly no it really isn't but wh'ever. though it isn't all that bad on a tele, but i suspect the fact that there's a tone pot hooked up to it might be part of the reason:scratchch
There's no pot attached to a Strat... so that's not the reason.
I also think the reason was purely cosmetic.
i know, i meant that the tone pot on a tele is almost always hooked up to the bridge pickup, as opposed to a strat.