****. 57 classic and 57 classic +
By Gibson are great as well.
'57's are one of the more so-so PAF's. Priced in the boutique range, but can't keep up with them tone-wise. Overrated PU's, and put in way too many Gibson models.
I agree. I'd been hearing about them for about 20 years, everyone seemed to like them. Then when I tried 'em I was less than blown away. Kinda disappointed. They seem to lack midrange. Then again, this was right after a long stretch of using a LP studio with a DiMarzio Super Distortion in the bridge.
ooh - forgot the BB1/2's in my list!!!!! Love those!!!!
I try hard to forget a lot of things Gibson has done....
The BB Pros sound pretty decent with an A3/UOA5 mod.
The A5 mags Gibson uses are horribly shrill... they're usable only if they're degaussed by at least 40%, but, at roughly the same charge, an UOA5 mag just blow'em out of the water, tone-wise.
HTH,
The A5 mags Gibson uses are horribly shrill... they're usable only if they're degaussed by at least 40%, but, at roughly the same charge, an UOA5 mag just blow'em out of the water, tone-wise.
HTH,
You look at Seymour and you see a lifelong passion and quest for tone quality, same with the boutique makers; I'm not seeing a Gibson equivalent.
Wait so are you saying not all A5 mags are created equal? :reporter:
There are at least three cast and one sintered A5 grades recognized officially.
Plus, every foundry has their own recipes...
Type Wiki Alnico and read...
For the company that invented HB's, to offer what they do today...no wonder so many aftermarket companies exist. Many have surpassed them in tone quality and selection.
+1. You have to wonder who's making the decision in the PU department,
Gibson is a guitar maker Seymour is a pickup maker. To that end Gibson doesnt seem to lend the weight to the pickups that others do
Same idiots that make decisions like 490/498.
But Gibson is a PU maker. They were a world innovator in that field, & have produced some of the world's best, and most copied PU's. It's disappointing that they've taken a back seat and let so many others surpass them.
But Gibson is a PU maker. They were a world innovator in that field, & have produced some of the world's best, and most copied PU's. It's disappointing that they've taken a back seat and let so many others surpass them.