It wouldn't bother me if Dean just disappeared (I've never liked any of their guitars), but all of this Gibson lawsuit stuff bothers me. If Gibson just focused on building good quality guitars that appeal to many players at a REASONABLE price, they wouldn't have to worry about putting their competition out of business. The competition hurts Gibson because they can build similar guitars, good quality, good looking, good playing, and at 1/4 to 1/2 the price.
Disclaimer:
I'm not a Gibson hater. I currently own 4 or 5 Gibsons and have owned at least 3-4 others. They used to be the best. But they have been making the same guitars they did 60 years ago (with maybe slightly lower quality) and charging 10-15 times as much. Don't tell me it's due to inflation. Some, of course, but other guitars that were made then and still now are only 5-10 times more expensive. With CNC and other mechanized building techniques, the cost of making guitars has actually gone down, relatively. Gibson sales remain high because of their name. They are, proverbially, resting on their laurels. And rather than keeping up with their competition, they are trying to eliminate it.