Thinking about getting an Epiphone Explorer
- Thread starter 357mag
- Start date
beaubrummels
Well-known member
Personally, I'm a fan of the Explorer shape. I don't own the Epi, but have a couple Gibsons with that profile. I find it balanced and comfortable. The lack of a top horn seems to sit better without any tummy cut and doesn't interfere with either fret access or strumming or movement of my right arm. The large body extension under the arm is a perfect arm rest. My first guitar almost was an Explorer, was the best sounding Gibson on the wall, but that particular one had a ground buzz problem, so I went with a Les Paul. I know better now, but...
I would just look at the Gibson wiring diagrams, unless you are looking at something with some custom number of pickups and/or coil split switches, etc.
http://images.gibson.com/Lifestyle/Support/Files/Schematics/ExplorerWiring.PDF
I would just look at the Gibson wiring diagrams, unless you are looking at something with some custom number of pickups and/or coil split switches, etc.
http://images.gibson.com/Lifestyle/Support/Files/Schematics/ExplorerWiring.PDF
Last edited:
Artie
Peaveyologist
All I can add, is that the bottom half isn't all that different from my Ibby Iceman. And I'm surprised by how well it sits in my lap. I bet it will be fine.
eclecticsynergy
Well-known member
I like the Explorer design. Yes it's long, but it balances well and is pretty ergonomic overall.
Explorers also generally have a big, full tone - I've never encountered one that sounded thin.
Nearly all of them use two volume controls, a master tone and a three-way toggle switch, just like most Flying Vees.
This Vee diagram would apply - the switch on an Explorer is further away but it's wired exactly the same.
Explorers also generally have a big, full tone - I've never encountered one that sounded thin.
Nearly all of them use two volume controls, a master tone and a three-way toggle switch, just like most Flying Vees.
This Vee diagram would apply - the switch on an Explorer is further away but it's wired exactly the same.
UnderTheFlame83
New member
CaptainWhizz
New member
The Jason Hook Epiphone came with a JB and 59 IIRC, which would be good for metal. Discontinued though, plus the paint job is a matter of taste.
As already mentioned, the Prophecy and the Ghost Horse are good, current choices.
As already mentioned, the Prophecy and the Ghost Horse are good, current choices.
eclecticsynergy
Well-known member
I checked the Epis out over at AMS - that olive drab is really unusual, very very cool.
Ghost Horse is an awesome model,especially for only a hundred dollars more.
Floyd Rose, contoured neck heel, 24-fret, real ebony board, and Burstbuckers. Satin neck & back too.
Could be the perfect Explorer for metal if only it didn't look so lame. Wish it came in solid colors instead of that quasi-silverburst.
The top even looks poorly matched. They're using veneer, for Pete's sake - it shouldn't be difficult to make the thing look good.
I'd even think about buying one to refin. IMO that guitar would absolutely slay in olive drab. Or satin black. Or white, or red.
Or a better sunburst - cherryburst or iced tea. Even grey primer would look better than what's on there.
Only my opinion, of course.
~
I have an older Epi korina myself. (Not sure what year they actually launched the korina series.) Mine's a '98.
White pickguard. Rosewood board rather than pau ferro as used on newer ones. Not technically a '58 reissue.
One thing I find very disappointing in the Epi "reissues" is they all have ordinary slim necks, not chunky ones.
No long-tenon neck joints, either, except for the Bonamassa "Amos" Vee. At Epi's price level that's forgivable.
But IMO they should've used a proper vintage neck profile for all of the '58 reissues. AFAIK only the Amos got that.
(I'm sure Joe specified that. But I also wouldn't be at all surprised to learn somebody tried to talk him out of it.)
Anyway, mine plays pretty much as well as my Gibson. Slightly heavier, perhaps a tad less lively. The Epi bodies are korina but they're multi-piece, with veneer covering the top and back. Doesn't show, unless you examine the sides looking for seams.
My Epi might even sustain a bit better than the Gibby. Still, my Gibson has a Vibrola and heavier tuners so it isn't exactly a fair comparison.
Fretwork and finish are fine. The tinted poly on mine is quite thick; I've sometimes said it looks almost as if it were dipped rather than sprayed.
No doubt today's finishes look less like Lucite.
Overall, the guitar plays well, sounds big and looks great. (Edit: Big dent at lower right corner is not Epiphone's fault...)
Here's mine, apologies for crummy cellphone pic:
and the Gibson:
Ghost Horse is an awesome model,especially for only a hundred dollars more.
Floyd Rose, contoured neck heel, 24-fret, real ebony board, and Burstbuckers. Satin neck & back too.
Could be the perfect Explorer for metal if only it didn't look so lame. Wish it came in solid colors instead of that quasi-silverburst.
The top even looks poorly matched. They're using veneer, for Pete's sake - it shouldn't be difficult to make the thing look good.
I'd even think about buying one to refin. IMO that guitar would absolutely slay in olive drab. Or satin black. Or white, or red.
Or a better sunburst - cherryburst or iced tea. Even grey primer would look better than what's on there.
Only my opinion, of course.
~
I have an older Epi korina myself. (Not sure what year they actually launched the korina series.) Mine's a '98.
White pickguard. Rosewood board rather than pau ferro as used on newer ones. Not technically a '58 reissue.
One thing I find very disappointing in the Epi "reissues" is they all have ordinary slim necks, not chunky ones.
No long-tenon neck joints, either, except for the Bonamassa "Amos" Vee. At Epi's price level that's forgivable.
But IMO they should've used a proper vintage neck profile for all of the '58 reissues. AFAIK only the Amos got that.
(I'm sure Joe specified that. But I also wouldn't be at all surprised to learn somebody tried to talk him out of it.)
Anyway, mine plays pretty much as well as my Gibson. Slightly heavier, perhaps a tad less lively. The Epi bodies are korina but they're multi-piece, with veneer covering the top and back. Doesn't show, unless you examine the sides looking for seams.
My Epi might even sustain a bit better than the Gibby. Still, my Gibson has a Vibrola and heavier tuners so it isn't exactly a fair comparison.
Fretwork and finish are fine. The tinted poly on mine is quite thick; I've sometimes said it looks almost as if it were dipped rather than sprayed.
No doubt today's finishes look less like Lucite.
Overall, the guitar plays well, sounds big and looks great. (Edit: Big dent at lower right corner is not Epiphone's fault...)
Here's mine, apologies for crummy cellphone pic:
and the Gibson:
Last edited:
