hey John,
have you tried the Whipple inductor?
I've had one a while, but haven't used it yet ..
Thanks guys....hehe I am connected to other sources...I am just a lazy bum that needs to check out our own suppliers...
But thanks a bunch!
200k is not very common anymore.
Christian.....I Looked at the Wilson wah site....It's funny cause I have a bunch of those selectable(clickable variable pots) but I've never used them....Here's the thing....Guitar players are pretty simple minded....Once I dial the wah in to my own liking,I pretty much just only use that voicing....So why put 12 different cap values on the wah? LOL...
I'll experiment with different cap values and resistance values...From there,I'll usually just solder the cap(s) and resistor values I came up with...The really tweaky guys like the adjustment and so then I'll either do an external mounted variable pot or I'll mount trimmer pots on the board....
Once I find that "sweet spot" sound,I find I always just come back to that setting on my wah....LOL...The Fulltone Deluxe wah also has the variable cap value pot and it just lowers or increases the cap values...That wah also has the 3 settings that I Liked on Lew's wah when he let me borrow it..
Very cool John....I must have overpaid for mine...$50.00 cash from CL.
Mine sounds great....I only use it a couple of times a night (I am no Kirk Hammett)..but is very vocal and works well clean or dirty.
I still wonder about different inductors....I should probably leave well enough alone.
Kevin is really big on the tweakable wahs, so is Geoffrey Teese and they both sell a lot of them but I hate 'em myself...
I have no outside controls on my wah at all.
I actually had Kevin just built me a drop in board for a Vox shell I had. It has 2 trim pots for fine tuning but no outside controls. Also worth mentioning...i've never even adjusted the trimmers from the wah Kevin had it set up when I got it!
Here is a quick shot of it...all except the buffer board which is mounded up above the switch.
It's a REALLY great sounding wah.
![]()
Here is a UTOOB comparison between a Wilson Signature and Kevins personal Clyde Signature wah.
Nice clean looking wah on the inside Christian...Cool to have adjustments on the pcb for "gain"...."volume".....and "Q" I prefer to keep everything on the insides of my wahs these days...External mounted pots can break and they move on adjustment...Your wah looks to have trimmers for gain and Q....Sometimes I install a midrange trimmer,but I've found I always go back to the midrange set resistance I like..Looks like the stock trannies(MPSA18) that Vox/Modern Dunlops use?
Thanks John!
One of the trimmers is labeled "Bass and Gain" and the other is labeled "sweep".
Like I said, the funny part is I've never once even tweaked them...it nailed the sound I hear in my head right out of the gate!
I'd have to look to be suyre but the trannys are 2N5232As I think...
I tried not to tell Kevin too much about specific parts...I just wanted the sond to be right and the gain to be right, it needed to have a fuzz buffer and I wanted it to be non true bypass...past that I didn't sweat too much in terms of details.
I hear ya on all counts!
The great thing about the Wilson is that it is above unity, has that slight little boost but it stays clean and pure but it's not all clippy like my Teese Picture wah was.
I have the same wah here and I think they're not from early 70s, and maybe even from 70s. Same structure, TDK inductor, same jacks, same pot.
Mine came with a paper label tied to a wire saying "84" and at the board you can read 84 too. My guess is that those things were made in the 80s.
I changed those jacks because they were loose and scretchy. The pot worked fine for months but now its crappy. I measured it with a multimeter and found some "dead" spots in the the pot course.
Changed the 4uF electrolytic cap with a modern 4.7 bipolar electrolytic cap.
Made it true bypass with a xingling DPDT (enforced with some heavy glue).
Voice resistor 100k instead of 33k.
Input resistor 33k instead of 68k to balance off and on volumes.
Since I bought it from a guy in ebay (4 years ago) it sounded too mid-treble to me. The sweep were so short, lacking that "ooouwha" sound. Never used this wah so much since then because I really didn't like the sound. When rocked to the treble position, this thing was so treble and harsh that I could hear radio stations. Also, when loud, at treble position the amp was noisy and microphonic. Just impossible to use.
Some months back I founded a "Led Zeppelin Tribute Band" that forced me to start using it again. After too much reading on the internet I decided to try some BC109B transistors in place of "5117" that it has originally. Bought 2 of them from a site and got it soldered (with some terminal re-arrangements because of different pinout).
The diference was day and night, heaven and hell, water and wine, **** and virginity, wherever you like. I'm shure you know what I mean.
All that bass and that "oouwhaa" sound it's there now. With pedal back I can even do some palm mute things. With the pedal forwarded, the treble is almost the same when it is in bypass mode.
All I need to do now is to search for a good pot.
Almost everything I found on ebay was fake Taiwanese Alpha "ICAR" taper pots.
What is the fasel inductor?
A) To the best of my knowledge fasel refers to the appearance and
conjectured make up. A way of discerning them. According to Thomas they
used one company to make all their inductors from 1958 to 1981.
Porr-Wagner probably made all the inductors, except the TDK, as TDK was
not listed in the VOX/THOMAS Vendor Files. TDK was introduced in roughly
1968 and used up to the close of Thomas in 1983. They still sold old
stock through 1983 when the rights were purchased by Jim Dunlop.
Here is a cool sight..it is translated, so some of the text seems weird.
http://translate.google.com/transla...eocities.jp/e08120/wahwah/wah.html&hl=en&sa=G