ToneGrinder, Part 3: 2nd round of testing ... and a clip!

TwilightOdyssey

Darkness on the edge of Tone
Well, a fresh approach and an early start is always preferable to doing any kind of testing after a long day of work! :)

Today I tackled the testing with an entirely new mindset (see Part 2 for details).

I decided that the 'grinders were probably driving the Splawn to clipping, and would divide the testing into two sections:

The first round would use the following:

V1, glass 12AX7
V2, glass 12AX7
PI, Red/Red

The second round would consist of:

V1, X100
V2, glass 12AT7
PI, Red/Red

After going back and forth a couple of times I noticed that the 'grinder/12AT7 combo was pushing the mids a lot and sounded rather boxy compared to the glass valves.

I very carefully worked up the gain/EQ/Presence for each type of tube to maximize it's particular tonal characteristics. Same results.

Then I took out the 12AX7 in V2 and replaced it with the 12AT7, and lo and bohold -- it sounded midrange heavy and boxy, too!

Blind-tested, you couldn't tell the difference between the 'grinder and the glass 12AX7 using the 12AT7 in V2. However, I found this to be less than acceptable due to that huge midrange push and the diminishing of overall size/boxiness of the tone.

NOTE: All listening tests was done through a Rivera 4x12 and further testing as well as all recording was done through the following chain:
Randall iso cab
Scumback M75
Sennheiser e609 silver
SSL XLogic mic preamp


This was my first ray of hope, because if I couldn't hear any significant difference between the 'grinder and the glass using the 12AT7 in the V2 slot, could I put a glass 12AX7 into the V2 slot and avoid the gain issues I had previously experienced?

I will let the clip provide the answer, if indeed there is an answer to be found.

Summary/review to be in Part 4, because I don't want to prejudice anyone prior to listening to the clip. Can you guess which setup was used on each part?

One guitar is using a 12AX7/12AX7/Red/Red configuration, the other guitar is using an X100/12AX7/Red/Red config.


https://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?action=download&ufid=dVlxNWNrdVUyWGNLSkE9PQ

I tried to do something that has clean guitars (well, clean for me -- I like a little hair on my cleans), riffing, as well as some intervallic stuff so you can hear the inner voicings.

One final note:

I did no post EQ or volume rides. I did do some minor adjustments to the Quick Rod to get the tones the way I like them, howoever.
 
Last edited:
Re: ToneGrinder, Part 3: 2nd round of testing ... and a clip!

I'm probably way the heck off, but what they hey? I'll play! :)

(0-:15) - tube

(:15-25) - TG

(:26) - tube

(:43) - TG

(1:00) - tube

(1:17) - tube for rhythm, TG for lead


One setup sounds a bit more hi-fi, brighter and aggressive and I'm assuming that's the ToneGrinders. The other side is a bit more congested and warmer, a bit thicker sounding and that I'm assuming is tubes. And if it's all one big joke and it's all one same setup then I need to really start training my ears.
 
Last edited:
Re: ToneGrinder, Part 3: 2nd round of testing ... and a clip!

Keep your ears the way they are -- you're very close!! :)
 
Re: ToneGrinder, Part 3: 2nd round of testing ... and a clip!

I'm probably way the heck off, but what they hey? I'll play! :)

(0-:15) - tube

(:15-25) - TG

(:26) - tube

(:43) - TG

(1:00) - tube

(1:17) - TG for rhythm, Tube for lead

This is how it sounds for me. I personally think the TG sounds good and is pretty close to the tube sound. This is new technology from a small company so it may take some time for them to completely get it right. I may be interested on some of these for my Mesa bass amp (especially the output 'tubes' they come up with.)
 
Re: ToneGrinder, Part 3: 2nd round of testing ... and a clip!

I personally think the TG sounds good and is pretty close to the tube sound. This is new technology from a small company so it may take some time for them to completely get it right. I may be interested on some of these for my Mesa bass amp (especially the output 'tubes' they come up with.)

I definitely agree.

Now that I've looped it a few times, I think the 1:17 rhythm section was the TG (I still stand by my comment that I think the lead riff is the TG though, it's not as warm and a touch stiff although time will tell whether I'm right or wrong on that). If anything, my thoughts should reflect one basic fact -- with stereo panning, the differences become much less apparent.

It sounds close enough to tube that with some tweaking I bet folks wouldn't really know the difference. Heck, in the recording context with multiple layers I bet it'd fool anyone. It sounds like that WattGrinder guy Darryl has quite a few different models, so possibly there'll be something a touch warmer and thicker to bridge that slight gap between these designs and regular tubes. I have to say though that I am impressed, I honestly didn't expect them to sound that good (especially with some of the skepticism I've read online). Hopefully the new website will be up soon, I may have to take the dive (especially if they can find a way to replace power tubes, it'd be a blessing not to have to worry about those going). My biggest concern is that I'll lose the natural sag of my Bogner with them (since they do seem to add a slightly stiffer sound), but I will be following them, that's for sure.

All in all, thanks again TwilightOdyssey for all of this, you've definitely opened up my eyes (great clip that really contrasts the ToneGrinder and tubes)! I'm glad to hear my ears aren't way off on this one; blind testing is never easy, I'm just fortunate enough to have some decent monitors and a decently treated room to analyze things. You know what I think about these things thus far, but I'm interested in how you feel about them :)
 
Last edited:
Re: ToneGrinder, Part 3: 2nd round of testing ... and a clip!

I was expecting a bit more of a 'scientific' clip here... the L/R thing is throwing me a bit over the lo-fi reproduction system I have available to me at the moment, no way to sum to mono here... but, after a solid day of being blasted at 110dB I'll hazard that the wattgrinders are panned right, and the real tubes left.

Eh?
 
Re: ToneGrinder, Part 3: 2nd round of testing ... and a clip!

I'm glad you're being critical, rather than trying to believe they're the greatest thing since sliced bread.

It makes this whole process more productive, and the owner may be more willing to let you experiment further with his many designs. I don't think the guy is wrong in exploring this technology, and I applaud both him and you for working with it, seeing what the outcome is.

I'm not a tube snob hoping for failure. I'm an open minded gear geek who's genuinely interested in where this goes.

If worse comes to worse, you can always exchange a few times and outfit your amps with Tonegrinders that function flawlessly forever in every position of your amp besides the crucial 1st position. Then, get something like a Tungsol 12AX7 there, and be done with retubing forever, besides your power tubes.
 
Re: ToneGrinder, Part 3: 2nd round of testing ... and a clip!

I actually like the tone fine. But, if the move from clean to gain is too abrupt that is not going to work for me so well. I like the dynamics I guess. But, it does appear you do not have set that were really intended to do that here as I understood it. No? Are the red ones not intended to be pretty hot? What of the lower gain versions?
 
Re: ToneGrinder, Part 3: 2nd round of testing ... and a clip!

I find the contrast between the two to create a pretty sweet tone when panned L and R simultaneously thru the same amp. If they weren;t as expensive, I'd probably grab some for recording.
 
Back
Top