Tube amp vs modeling. Is there latency?

Re: Tube amp vs modeling. Is there latency?

Do you notice the added delay if you step a foot further away from your tube amp? Sound travels slower than I think most of us realize.

I'm not saying there's nothing different about the feel of modelers, because they're not always perfect, but the latency isn't the issue unless it's really bad outdated technology.

Sent from my BlackBerry using Tapatalk

Yes I tried it and I didn’t notice anything.

Maybe i do notice it more on the vypyr because is old tech?
 
Re: Tube amp vs modeling. Is there latency?

I think that at this point it's more about the placebo effect.

Sent from my Alcatel_5044C using Tapatalk

It could be or not be.
Seriously When I play both amps I don’t think about which one is superior. I think about my playing.
In sound they both sound good, sometimes the modeler better. But In pick attack and latency the tube amp wins.
 
Re: Tube amp vs modeling. Is there latency?

8 milliseconds is the difference between standing 2ft in front of your amp as opposed to 8 ft
 
Re: Tube amp vs modeling. Is there latency?

Well if it's not latency then it's something else. The fact is it does feel different playing a modeler than a tube amp & it's pretty noticeable. I'm not saying it's good or bad..just different. So if modelers claim to feel & sound just like a tube amp well, that's just not the case and that goes as much for the Fractal as for the Line 6 Spider...the tech is not there yet & may never be there.
 
Re: Tube amp vs modeling. Is there latency?

I agree my modeling amps "feel" more different than they sound

The tubes are spongier more vocal

The models do that too but with an accent
 
Re: Tube amp vs modeling. Is there latency?

Live I use a Marshall Code 100 combo. There’s no perceivable latency.

When I record I use either a Johnson J-Station or amp plugins in Logic Pro X. There’s also no perceivable latency there.

I have also played through a Fractal AxeFX II, A/B’ing it with a Mesa TriAxis, and it sounded and felt like the tube amp.

Even running AmpliTube on my iPhone 8 doesn’t produce any noticeable latency. CPUs are pretty fast these days.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Re: Tube amp vs modeling. Is there latency?

Ok I was on another forum and someone mention that it could not be latency. It could be the sag the each amp has.
So maybe that’s why I don’t like the vypyr.

Just tried out the boss katana. And the response is Better ( to me) than the vypyr. But in high gain tone. Vypyr wins
 
Re: Tube amp vs modeling. Is there latency?

Live I use a Marshall Code 100 combo. There’s no perceivable latency.

When I record I use either a Johnson J-Station or amp plugins in Logic Pro X. There’s also no perceivable latency there.

I have also played through a Fractal AxeFX II, A/B’ing it with a Mesa TriAxis, and it sounded and felt like the tube amp.

Even running AmpliTube on my iPhone 8 doesn’t produce any noticeable latency. CPUs are pretty fast these days.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hey dude how do you compare the axe fx to plugins. Is that expensive hardware worth it
In the studio and probably live?
 
Re: Tube amp vs modeling. Is there latency?

Hey dude how do you compare the axe fx to plugins. Is that expensive hardware worth it
In the studio and probably live?

I haven’t recorded with an AxeFX, but I’d imagine it’s similar to plugins, since that’s pretty much what it is. Same with my Marshall... just a computer with plugins.

I know from using my J-Station and plugins, the plugins seem to have more definition. The J-Station always sounds a bit blurrier. But that’s not always a bad thing.

Live no one knows I’m using a modeling amp. I have people coming up after our set saying they loved my tone. I got a modeling amp because our recordings are plugins, and on a couple of songs I make a pretty drastic tonal change mid song. It’s lots of fun. It also cut down how many pedals I need to use on stage.

The Code also cleans up when you turn down the volume on the guitar. My only complaint is the speakers are cheap.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Re: Tube amp vs modeling. Is there latency?

I have a Fractal AX8 and have recorded with it extensively. In the studio, I don't hear/feel any latency. It is easy to go down the rabbit hole of endless tweaking, so if you don't dig that, it isn't the right device.
 
Re: Tube amp vs modeling. Is there latency?

I haven’t recorded with an AxeFX, but I’d imagine it’s similar to plugins, since that’s pretty much what it is. Same with my Marshall... just a computer with plugins.

I know from using my J-Station and plugins, the plugins seem to have more definition. The J-Station always sounds a bit blurrier. But that’s not always a bad thing.

Live no one knows I’m using a modeling amp. I have people coming up after our set saying they loved my tone. I got a modeling amp because our recordings are plugins, and on a couple of songs I make a pretty drastic tonal change mid song. It’s lots of fun. It also cut down how many pedals I need to use on stage.

The Code also cleans up when you turn down the volume on the guitar. My only complaint is the speakers are cheap.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks I was planing on getting an axe fx but it’s the same as a good plugin.

This thread is making me realize that I should play more instead looking for gear. Only one thing
I can say, personally I’m loving how my tube amp is responding to my playing :)
 
Re: Tube amp vs modeling. Is there latency?

Latencies do stack up if you have multiple devices. If you have three lower latency devices, they could add up to something you do notice.


The fact is it does feel different playing a modeler than a tube amp & it's pretty noticeable

This is varies quite a bit from modeler to modeler. In general, you get what you pay for in terms of tone, latency, feel, etc. The low end of the market is rapidly catching up....

Modelers can be more challenging to dial in ... just like many amps that have many, powerful controls.
 
Re: Tube amp vs modeling. Is there latency?

I've never noticed latency playing any digital amp.

I remember when the first version of amplitube came out though . . . and I installed a demo of it on my computer. It sounded nice, but wasn't usable for me because there was about an 80 or 90 ms delay. Not sure if it was a software problem or because my computer wasn't up to spec. When latency is a problem, it's a HUGE problem, and not subtle at all.
 
Re: Tube amp vs modeling. Is there latency?

I think it depends. 1ms is about the lowest amount of time that a human can detect and I would say that on average it takes about 5ms for the average human to notice an audible difference between a relative undelayed signal. The human brain is extremely smart and it uses visual and other sensual inputs to " time " things up. So even though you see, feel and hear things that do not actually line up in time, your brain will correct the discrepancies and align them for you. It's kinda like the basketball that a friend is bouncing from across the street. You see him bounce the ball and then you hear the bounce much later in time. Your brain realizes that there is a distance between you and the ball bounce you saw and instead of being confusing to you, it seems normal and natural to hear the bounce much later than when you saw the bounce.

If you have a very well-tuned ear and you can recognize a difference in time from your sensory inputs I don't see it being an issue at all to notice a 1-2ms difference in relative sound arrivals. I say this with a HUGE caveat though. If you sit near your amp at say 4-6' away almost all the time, then a latency of a few ms may be noticeable. If you're typically standing up and moving around when you play and not stationary, I would venture a good bet you couldn't tell even if the latency was 5ms or more. It comes down mostly to relative information. If you don't have a good relative baseline, then small changes are less likely to be noticed.

Sound travels through air at about 1,100 feet per second ( at sea level ), so even a couple of feet between you and the source of sound can be measured audibly. You feel instantly when you play the note and with an analog amplifier and the sound should come out of the speaker at essentially the same instant ( analog electrical signals travel at nearly the speed of light), making the time of flight from the speaker to your ear the only latency you should have. An easy, but very general rule for short distances up to around 20' is to account 1ms for time of flight to every foot of distance. For instance, if you are 20' away from your amplifier, you should expect to have a delay/latency from hearing the sound of about 20ms ( actually 17.9ms at sea level ). This is a very audible amount of delay or latency, but for most guitarists who are roughly 10-20' away from their amplifiers, this is normal. The brain has corrected this for you. You know the speaker is not next to you and therefore it can't possibly create sound instantly at your ear and your brain knows this.

I am a sound engineer and a guitarist of 27 years and I can tell if there is a small latency because I have trained my ears to hear this over many years. Things still sound normal and fine under what I consider normal conditions. I can hear if there is excessive latency though. If I use a digital processor or a digital amp like Amplitube for instance, I can tell there is latency. Stage monitors, for instance, is one such thing that most don't realize how much latency is actually present. In an analog PA system, you would only have latency from the speaker's cone to your head or roughly 5-6ms. This is 100% normal and most people never notice it. When you go to a digital PA system, the latency can increase by a couple of ms. for the same scenario, and again most people don't notice it. In some cases though, you can end up with a device that adds a significant amount of delay and the latency will become noticeable. I find this to be true mostly with speakers that utilize cheap digital amplifiers with multiple settings and or FIR filters. The newer Mackie SRM professional line is one such speaker that has excessive latency. It utilizes technology that is similar if not actually an FIR filter for its crossover network. It is lower end though and the processor isn't as fast as it could be, so the speaker has several ms of latency and when used as a monitor you can hear this latency quite easily ( at least I can ).

In either case, I do believe that you are recognizing the latency present within the Peavey Vyper amp, the question is does this hinder your playing? I find that with about 20ms of latency it becomes very noticeable, at around 40ms of latency it starts to get difficult to track your playing and at around 80ms you are relying on muscle memory as any kind of real tracking becomes impossible. Just to create a reference though, if using an analog amp, standing 20' away has about 20ms of delay, standing 40' away has roughly 40ms of delay etc.
 
Back
Top