Re: Warped neck
First of all, if it's a Prestige, that means it's a multi-piece neck. 2017, we're talking 5 piece maple/walnut, right...???
That guitar is just barely two years old, and you could drive a truck over it and not break it. Neck warping takes time. It's too young, and too good of a neck to be warped.
Me, personally, I'd do a standard setup and then check to see if I've got an optical illusion going on. To me, this means using a "Neck Check" gauge (like a long ruler with notches cutout for the frets so that the ruler can lay flat against the fretboard). Put it between the D and the G strings, and adjust the truss rod so that the gauge is dead flat against the fretboard. Then it's a combination of very minor adjustments to the truss rod AND adjusting string height at the bridge in order to get the action set right. I almost never check the 1st and the 5th fret, I check the 12th fret and go with 2mm under low E, and 1.5mm under high E. If I have too much fret buzz at that point, then I'm lowering the strings at the bridge, and adding more neck relief until the buzzing is gone and I've got my string height set right at the 12th.
I sometimes wonder if I should check the 1st fret first and then move on to the 12th, but I never do it this way when I actually start turning allen wrenches.
Me, personally, I seriously question the notion that the neck is warped. I think that the problem is "Neck Relief Curvature (x) Fretboard Radius (x) Dead Straight Guitar Strings (x) Different String Spacing At The Nut And Bridge." You put that many variables together, and suddenly your neck looks warped, no matter how new or rock solid the neck is...!!!
And now I have a brand new problem. I've got 4 variable mentioned, and merely multiplication going on. That doesn't sound right. I think that I need a divisor, and then one of those variable should become a coefficient. How about the Dead Straight Guitar Strings as a divisor in an inverse formula, and the String Spacing as the coefficient. I think that's right...
