audiocheck
New member
Re: Well crack my walnuts!!!!!!
typical in '79. My '79 Custom had to have a refret in only 5 years of use.
typical in '79. My '79 Custom had to have a refret in only 5 years of use.
As much as people online knock Gibson, the guitars are consistently better than the Norlin product ever was.
The originals have three significant features that the new reissue doesn't:
Real ebony fretboard
Long tenon neck joint
T-tops
I'd look for an old one rather than paying more than it's worth for a so-so modern copy. The originals (that's The Paul, not the Firebrand or the The Paul II) play well and sound massive.
I would take a 3 piece Maple Neck, Pancake Body and 3 piece plain top over any fake ebony fingerboard any day of the week. Plus Norlin era wood is now aged to perfection.
Does the richlite stuff really sound/feel that bad? Or are people vehemently opposed to it just because?
Does the richlite stuff really sound/feel that bad? Or are people vehemently opposed to it just because?
I loved the three piece maple necks, never had to adjust any of them and they had a little more bite to them than the mahogany necks. Volutes made sense, too.I would take a 3 piece Maple Neck, Pancake Body and 3 piece plain top over any fake ebony fingerboard any day of the week. Plus Norlin era wood is now aged to perfection.
I loved the three piece maple necks, never had to adjust any of them and they had a little more bite to them than the mahogany necks. Volutes made sense, too.
Does the richlite stuff really sound/feel that bad? Or are people vehemently opposed to it just because?
Just because......
And despite probably only being a few $$ different to buy a fretboard of one vs the other, critics somehow want the guitar to be thousands cheaper due to no ebony.
There is a manic 'like it was in the 50's' mentality with most LP owners. Its in part why the 'Norlins suck' brigade exists. Many haven't even actually played any, they just hate because the next person does and they can do no better than parrot other's beliefs - beliefs that are most likely parroted in the first place.
It usually comes as a great shock that the 'golden age' of Gibson was responsible for the change to a volute, 3 piece neck, 3 piece tops, oversized headstock, pancake body, 14 degree headstock angle and move away from long tenon construction.
The second shock is that the latter part of the Norlin era was responsible for removing most of these and returning to more vintage specs.
Henry did absolutely nothing when he took over to the construction of a LP in the USA line to make it more vintage.....he kept the nashville bridge, short tenon, 3 piece top and weight relief rolling right along.
Had an old Firebrand. It ripped.
Anybody talking smack on all Norlin Gibsons because ‘muh uncle’s roommate’s pancake body’ needs to lay off the kool aid.
Amen!
BC rich glues a dozen pieces of wood together and it has GOD-tone. Gibson glues three together and it sucks....as if you can see it anyway. I have two Pancake LPs. A 73 and a 74 repro. They sound fantastic.
Maple neck win > pancake loss (Not that there really is any except according to the internet)
If you love T-Tops, sure. I don't. So win....duncans would go in anyway. 59's perhaps!