Wouldn't n stand for nano farad?
It does indeed stand for nano. Thanks
Actually, it doesn't.
The first two digits, (10), are called "significant digits". The third digit is the multiplier. In this case, zero. The total is in picofarads. So, a 104 would be 10 with 4 zero's, or 100,000 picofarads, or .1 uf's. They don't rate caps in nanofarads.
The "n" is the tolerance. In this case, +/-0.05%.
So, you have a 10pf cap.
Edit: Here's a good link: http://xtronics.com/kits/ccode.htm
Actually, it doesn't.
The first two digits, (10), are called "significant digits". The third digit is the multiplier. In this case, zero. The total is in picofarads. So, a 104 would be 10 with 4 zero's, or 100,000 picofarads, or .1 uf's. They don't rate caps in nanofarads.
The "n" is the tolerance. In this case, +/-0.05%.
So, you have a 10pf cap.
Edit: Here's a good link: http://xtronics.com/kits/ccode.htm
That all depends on where you're looking at the numbers, but yeah, that's exactly it. If you're looking at a schematic that has the values written in nanofarads (and I've seen them, see runoffgroove.com), then the N does mean just that, nanofarads. Seeing that number on a cap itself would normally be the tolerance. A 100n on a schematic translates to .1uf just like your example.
That all depends on where you're looking at the numbers, but yeah, that's exactly it. If you're looking at a schematic that has the values written in nanofarads (and I've seen them, see runoffgroove.com), then the N does mean just that, nanofarads. Seeing that number on a cap itself would normally be the tolerance. A 100n on a schematic translates to .1uf just like your example.
They just choose to label the parts that way. Some label them in microfarads, some in nanofarads. In the case of what you're looking at, it's nanofarads. Just use a capacitor value conversion chart to get the microfarad number.This schematic is from runoffgroove.com
So what's the deal?
No problem, Artie. As soon as I saw he was talking about "n" in a value, I had a pretty good idea what he was looking at, and I guessed it right.You're right, and I forgot that he was looking at a schematic. I'm glad someone's looking over my shoulder.
Thanks, Erik.
They just choose to label the parts that way. Some label them in microfarads, some in nanofarads. In the case of what you're looking at, it's nanofarads. Just use a capacitor value conversion chart to get the microfarad number.
So a nano farad would be equalt to 1,000 pico-farads or .001 micr-farads?