What is it about bolt-ons?

[UCSDBoy]

Re: What is it about bolt-ons?

Agreed. I have never needed to replace a neck. I don't even personally KNOW anyone who has......

too true - I've heard that people who do sometimes run into problems when necks from one manufacturer are not entirely compatable with another manufacturer's body - even though they're supposed to be replacement strat/tele/etc necks... I've heard the best thing you can do most times is to get the neck from the same place you got the body...

 

[59paul]

Re: What is it about bolt-ons?

SRV's #1 had a replacement neck ( neck and body were not same year ). So did Clapton's Blackie ( it was constructed from different guitars ). And Hendrix...well, he used to twist the necks up so bad, they were always looking for new one's.

 

[Mr Wolf]

Re: What is it about bolt-ons?

My Kramer is very comfortable, has a good amound of sustain, and im able to get good sounds out of it. I've played both set necks and neck throughs aswell and cannot complain with either as far as sound or feel. Because of this i wont let the type of neck joint be too much of a factor in choosing a guitar.

 

[MattPete]

Re: What is it about bolt-ons?

I wonder how much of the snappiness vs. woodiness is all down to the neck wood. That is, almost all bolt-ons are maple, and almost all set-necks are mahogany. My bolt-on Warmoth VIP/PRS clone with a mahogany is far woodier than my other Warmoth guitars that use a maple neck.

 

[some_dude]

Re: What is it about bolt-ons?

I wonder how much of the snappiness vs. woodiness is all down to the neck wood. That is, almost all bolt-ons are maple, and almost all set-necks are mahogany. My bolt-on Warmoth VIP/PRS clone with a mahogany is far woodier than my other Warmoth guitars that use a maple neck.

Doesn't Zakk Wylde prefer maple necks on his Les Pauls for the extra snap and bite?

 

[Hot _Grits]

Re: What is it about bolt-ons?

SRV's #1 had a replacement neck ( neck and body were not same year ). So did Clapton's Blackie ( it was constructed from different guitars ). And Hendrix...well, he used to twist the necks up so bad, they were always looking for new one's.

Just so you know, it is not uncommon to open up stock pre-CBS fenders and find the neck and body stamps from different years. They used to match up bodies and necks from whatever pile was lying around. SRV's neck is not a replacement, unless you're talking about the one he fitted after a lighting rig fell on #1 not long before his death.

Onto the subject:

I own bolt and glued guitars, but there are too many differing characteristics on the guitars to give you a picture of what the various neck joins do. I will say this: I don't like most neck-thru guitars. Basically because they generally use a maple neck section, and the maple-to other woods balance becomes a bit skewed towards the maple end of things. Sure, you get sustain, but your tone will be a bit bright and hard sounding.

 

[59paul]

Re: What is it about bolt-ons?

Yep. I read where Stevie said #1 just wasn't the same after that, which is understandable. He liked those Big necks. Just goes to show that even the most coveted of Guitars can have an unfortunate mishap. But nevertheless, they un-bolted the neck and put on a Replacement. Oh Yeah, Just so You know, ........I knew. :duh: