What is the Value of "Made In USA" for SD Pickups? (Part II)

Re: What is the Value of "Made In USA" for SD Pickups? (Part II)

Isn't it about time to close this thread? I think the point has been made.

Why would we close it? This is great dialogue on an important topic. And this isn't about making a point. It's about soliciting opinions from our on-line community.

When we asked the same question five years ago, we never closed the thread. In fact, you can read it here. It's interesting to me to see how the replies have changed over the last five years. I'm not sure if the SDUGF membership has changed. Or attitudes have changed. Or both.
 
Re: What is the Value of "Made In USA" for SD Pickups? (Part II)

The only aftermarket pu's, I've ever purchased have all been SD's. If it's not stock in my guitars, it's a SD. I would rather SD close up shop than to go overseas, the result would be the same either way for me, no more SD pu's.
 
Re: What is the Value of "Made In USA" for SD Pickups? (Part II)

Not enough time for me to read the entire thread either but...

There's a perception in the realm of electric guitars (at least here in the USA) that "Made in USA" is the best. Unfortunately this does not apply to everything made in here. This does not discount the fact that products produced in other countries are also excellent.

So yes there's a value in Made in USA for SD pickups (or any other vendor), but there's also business realities that can also drive a move of production somewhere else.

Can that product be as good (or better)? yes

Will that product be perceived as good (note not necessarily overseas - could be some other US state or territory)? Probably not.

Would I buy that product? If it provided something I wanted. I'd certainly prefer it be US made.
 
Re: What is the Value of "Made In USA" for SD Pickups? (Part II)

Why would we close it? This is great dialogue on an important topic. And this isn't about making a point. It's about soliciting opinions from our on-line community.

When we asked the same question five years ago, we never closed the thread. In fact, you can read it here. It's interesting to me to see how the replies have changed over the last five years. I'm not sure if the SDUGF membership has changed. Or attitudes have changed. Or both.

Fair enough
 
Re: What is the Value of "Made In USA" for SD Pickups? (Part II)

I dont live in the USA and, even though it will go against the generally views here, made in USA by itself means almost nothing to me.

Good quality is important to me and I will pay a premium for a guarantee of that. If made in USA is the only way to do that fine, but I cant help thinking about how many high tech goods are very well manufactured in Asia.
 
Re: What is the Value of "Made In USA" for SD Pickups? (Part II)

“Made in the USA” should hold great value to SD because any company would have to re-establish it's reputation for quality concerning parts, labor, and service after a move. How much is that reputation worth ? Considering the types of products SD sells, their competition and their current reputation, it is significant.

Also, I believe people are becoming much more aware about where the goods they purchase are made. How much this factors in to purchasing, I can only speak for myself. I would only purchase SD pickups that were “Made in the USA”.
 
Re: What is the Value of "Made In USA" for SD Pickups? (Part II)

There is a reason that I play Gibson Les Paul and use Seymour Duncan pickups. The main reason is quality. Made in the USA generally means that you are purchasing a quality product. The older I get the more important the “Made in the USA” label has become to me. That’s not to say that other countries don’t make excellent products- my amp is from Germany; however, I like to try and support the US economy when I can. Moving Duncan production overseas would stop me from being a loyal customer.
 
Re: What is the Value of "Made In USA" for SD Pickups? (Part II)

The value of made in USA is almost immeasurable. I know there is a place, in the market, for guitar products made in other countries, but I cringe every time I hear of another mfg moving production overseas. Fender and Gibson, both started in the USA, were obviously the most influential brands in the formation of what we know as electric guitar, and their current management seems to understand how to balance a mix of US and foreign made products in their lines. The USA is where Seymour Duncan started, and that means a lot. If SD had started in some other country, I don't think you would have as much to lose by moving production.

+1
 
Re: What is the Value of "Made In USA" for SD Pickups? (Part II)

There is a reason that I play Gibson Les Paul and use Seymour Duncan pickups. The main reason is quality. Made in the USA generally means that you are purchasing a quality product. The older I get the more important the “Made in the USA” label has become to me. That’s not to say that other countries don’t make excellent products- my amp is from Germany; however, I like to try and support the US economy when I can. Moving Duncan production overseas would stop me from being a loyal customer.

+1
 
Re: What is the Value of "Made In USA" for SD Pickups? (Part II)

This may be a shocker, but Made In USA means nothing to me; or very little due to being a supporter of quality gear no matter where it was manufactured.

...and before I get flamed, I do care about this country and the jobs that the "Made in USA" stamp provides is crucial to its economy, maybe...

However, "Made in USA" stamp is just a stamp. Sure, it may satisfy some EGOs and may magically scream to some "Made In USA is Holy Grail Tone", but if Seymour decided to move his pickup production somewhere else; using the same quality components to make his pickups, then whether it is "Made In USA" or not, the pickups still sound the same.

Maybe I was wrong about a stamp being a stamp... "Made in USA" stamp adds that finishing component of TONE or prestige... I guilty of that myself, but now I am a BKP user.
 
Re: What is the Value of "Made In USA" for SD Pickups? (Part II)

If we're talking about other high income, developed country - it wouldn't bother me. There's no reason why SD should not make a factory that works directly with guitar manufacturers in Japan or Europe and sells to musicians in those areas.

If we're talking about low income, sweatshop happy countries - forget it. There are other first world pickup manufacturers with a rather competitive price.
 
Re: What is the Value of "Made In USA" for SD Pickups? (Part II)

How restricted is access, right now, to Seymour Duncan products? It's one of the most ubiquitous pickup lines on the planet, both OEM and aftermarket.

It's certainly restricted, in general, to those who can pay for it. Should SD do away with that restriction and give their products away? How much more access are you envisioning?

That was what I was pointing out -- MORE people will have access to Seymour Duncan pickups if they were cheaper. Of course, this is assuming that by moving outside of the USA, the costs and ultimately the retail prices will go down while maintaining the same quality.

Now I'm not sure why Seymour Duncan pickups are more expensive in other markets than the others, and moving manufacturing locations might not solve those issues (e.g. import quotas, export taxes, compliance requirements, etc.), but I'm sure the company can choose a location which, at the end of the day, looking at the global operations, costs can be cut and prices can be lowered and you gain more profits by selling at a higher volume (more people happy).

Everybody benefits from lower purchase prices. The key is maintaining quality.


For many companies, getting bigger (ie, "growing the business") often means taking on investors. People who aren't going to be doing the work or even showing up at the office, but who might still expect to be able to tell you how to do things. At the very least, they are going to expect return on investment. They put money in; they get more money back. Often they don't care how that happens, as long as it happens. Sometimes bad things can come from this. (I've seen painful examples in other industries.) Sometimes this kind of business arrangement works out well, and sometimes it doesn't. I think there's a fancy business name for what they call this, but I studied EE in university so I wouldn't know.

It doesn't always have to happen. Seymour Duncan can stay a private company and perhaps double or triple their output. I can say this because there are a LOT of private companies out there which I am almost certain are bigger than Seymour Duncan.

Besides, if Seymour Duncan went public, the company does NOT necessarily have to suffer. Seymour Duncan can get more money infused but still maintain control of the ownership and management. A lot of companies actually became bigger and better after going public.
 
Re: What is the Value of "Made In USA" for SD Pickups? (Part II)

^ You're making a lot of assumptions that I'm not so sure are valid.
 
Re: What is the Value of "Made In USA" for SD Pickups? (Part II)

^ List a few and let's see if those assumptions are really invalid (if assumptions can be invalidated at all).
 
Re: What is the Value of "Made In USA" for SD Pickups? (Part II)

That was what I was pointing out -- MORE people will have access to Seymour Duncan pickups if they were cheaper. Of course, this is assuming that by moving outside of the USA, the costs and ultimately the retail prices will go down while maintaining the same quality.

I don't know that you're assuming it, but you seem to be at least implying that lowering the retail price would be the goal in outsourcing, and that lowering cost is necessarily tied to lowering retail price. Perhaps loosely, but not as a rule. I've seen dealer margins change on lines in other industries; this often means that the dealer pays more (to the manufacturer) while the retail price stays the same. (Sometimes it goes the other way.)

I don't see that Seymour Duncan has an obligation to make their products more accessible financially. In many ways this would equate to them getting paid less for the same work or the same product. They could ask their dealers to take some of the hit, which would certainly spread the joy around.

People who don't want to pay full price for Seymour Duncan pickups have options. There is the used market, which would seem to be pretty healthy based on the posts here on the forum. There is the Duncan Performer line, which is more aggressively priced. And there is competitive Internet pricing, which rewards vendors for shipping product at the lowest price.

Now I'm not sure why Seymour Duncan pickups are more expensive in other markets than the others, and moving manufacturing locations might not solve those issues (e.g. import quotas, export taxes, compliance requirements, etc.), but I'm sure the company can choose a location which, at the end of the day, looking at the global operations, costs can be cut and prices can be lowered and you gain more profits by selling at a higher volume (more people happy).

Do you have an projections on how changes in retail price would impact sales figures? Maybe you should schedule a meeting with the SD management team. Because maybe they were thinking they'd just pocket the production savings. How about happiness? What's your forecast for that? Can you map the global migration of human happiness from Santa Barbara to Qingdao?

Everybody benefits from lower purchase prices.

Dealers don't always benefit when the price of an item drops. They make less money per unit that they sell, so they have to work harder and sell more units to make the same money that they made before the price drop. Shipping doesn't get cheaper, nor do rent, utilities, employees, insurance, etc.

The key is maintaining quality.

The key is maintaining the perception of quality. You could have all the quality you want; you could have the same or better quality with overseas manufacturing, but if people assume, think, or read online that the quality has dropped, it won't do you much good.

Seymour Duncan can stay a private company and perhaps double or triple their output.

How do you know this? Do you have a business plan for them?

I can say this because there are a LOT of private companies out there which I am almost certain are bigger than Seymour Duncan.

Yes, but could the Seymour Duncan Company do it? Do they even want to?

Besides, if Seymour Duncan went public, the company does NOT necessarily have to suffer. Seymour Duncan can get more money infused but still maintain control of the ownership and management. A lot of companies actually became bigger and better after going public.

Just playing devil's advocate here. Some companies choose to grow by going public, and it's a big, big topic. It's harder to talk about being small and family-owned after the IPO. As a consumer, I find it a little harder to feel good about a company when I know that all or most of the people who own it don't work there. That they often buy into companies because of speculation on the stock price and not because they care what goes on there.

BTW, I'm sick of this topic. If I come back here, Evan has my permission to repo my A2P.
 
Re: What is the Value of "Made In USA" for SD Pickups? (Part II)

So how many of the US only crowd own an Ibanez, a MIM/MIJ Fender, a Godin, a Yamaha, a Marshall, a Vox, an ESP, a Traynor, GFS pickups, Schaller or Gotoh hardware, etc? Why?

I have a MIM Strat and Tele, MIK Kramers, MIK LTD, and three Carvins. I can tolerate the MIMs (in all fairness they play great) but the other non-US guitars are complete junk. Bad QA without a doubt.

I have hot rodded my MIMs with Seymour Duncan and DiMarzio pickups, both American companies. I absolutely adore my Carvins; two are stock while my newest acquisition has been refitted with DiMarzio parts as well as MIJ hardware. I have a love and appreciation for this land of ours, the US, that makes me buy nothing but MIA guitar stuff. The only exception to this is genuine Japan parts; I have a soft spot in my heart for Japan since I learned how to play the guitar while living there. Also, well, their stuff is great too. But I will not pay a penny more for import stuff from Korea, Indonesia, China, or Mexico; yes there is a market for those countries but not for me. When I started playing guitar I was just enthusiastic about playing; I never really payed attention to where the product was being assembled. But now that I have been playing for a while I have grown to appreciate the genuine stuff. Hence all my pup purchases have been DiMarzio or Seymour Duncan.

If indeed productions shifts overseas I will be quite upset. I was at the SDUGD and was absolutely floored at all the cool R&A, testing, manufacturing, and everything else happening here, in my own backyard, here in the US. I got to meet Seymour himself, MJ, Evan, and everyone else that makes Seymour Duncan work. Here. In our own backyard. In the US. Where it all started. Where it belongs.

So yeah, please stay here.

:usa2:
 
Re: What is the Value of "Made In USA" for SD Pickups? (Part II)

I prefer to buy products made in Canada, America, Europe, and Japan. This goes for shoes, to cars, to tools, to guitar and related products.

If SD were to go overseas, I would never buy a new pickup from the company again. Every time I hear about how a company grows large and becomes more successful leaving the country to seek cheaper pastures, I cringe. If it was the western nations that made you so successful then why betray them but taking their jobs away and offering an inferior (if only slightly) product?

This as well. ^^^^
 
Re: What is the Value of "Made In USA" for SD Pickups? (Part II)

This is my first time seeing this thread. I haven't read the whole thing, but I plan to. My biggest concern is the sound. For some reason, the foreign-made pickups don't sound right. Even if the design and specs are similar, they always sound muffled - like the treble and bass are chopped off, and all the sound is concentrated in the low midrange and upper bass frequencies. Right now, all my pickups are Seymour Duncans for one reason: the sound. The full spectrum of tone from these pickups is one of the most important links between my fingers and my speakers.
 
Re: What is the Value of "Made In USA" for SD Pickups? (Part II)

I don't know that you're assuming it, but you seem to be at least implying that lowering the retail price would be the goal in outsourcing, and that lowering cost is necessarily tied to lowering retail price. Perhaps loosely, but not as a rule. I've seen dealer margins change on lines in other industries; this often means that the dealer pays more (to the manufacturer) while the retail price stays the same. (Sometimes it goes the other way.)

The goal of outsourcing is almost always lowering costs. You lower costs by being more efficient. With lower costs, you can almost always lower retail/purchase prices. Whether or not you're going to want to lower prices is another matter. What I'm just saying is that, if SD Co. play their cards right, they can and will be able to do it.


I don't see that Seymour Duncan has an obligation to make their products more accessible financially.

I agree, Duncan has NO obligation whatsoever.

Looking at how they continuously expand their product lines -- vertically and horizontally -- SD Co. seems to want to reach out to more people.

In many ways this would equate to them getting paid less for the same work or the same product. They could ask their dealers to take some of the hit, which would certainly spread the joy around.

This is exactly why many companies try to lower costs, and why many companies go off shore or outsource. Nobody needs to take the hit.

People who don't want to pay full price for Seymour Duncan pickups have options. There is the used market, which would seem to be pretty healthy based on the posts here on the forum. There is the Duncan Performer line, which is more aggressively priced. And there is competitive Internet pricing, which rewards vendors for shipping product at the lowest price.

Yes, except that SD Co. don't really get anything from people buying used. Unless of course the seller buys a new Duncan pickup. A Duncan Performer is a Duncan Performer. It's not a Seymour Duncan. I'm not sure how that business is growing, if it is at all.



Do you have an projections on how changes in retail price would impact sales figures? Maybe you should schedule a meeting with the SD management team.

No I don't. But I believe if SD Co. starts slashing 10USD off the retail prices, their sales figures are going to go up. Walmart is one of the biggest companies in the world by adopting an everyday low price strategy (of course they have among the best, if not the best, supply chains). Low prices work, for as long as the quality is there. The only issue with low prices is that perception that lower prices mean lower quality.

Because maybe they were thinking they'd just pocket the production savings.

They could certainly do that. Nothing wrong with that as well. Although, like I said, with their ever expanding product lines, I believe SD Co. is not thinking about just pocketing whatever cost savings they get.

How about happiness? What's your forecast for that?

You took "happiness" too literally. I was not thinking about a feeling of elation or whatever. What I was pointing out is that people are going to be happier if a product that they want was more accessible. For example, I haven't bought me a Slash Alnico 2 Pro because the prices are still up there. Give me 20% off and I'm going to buy one via Amazon right now.

Can you map the global migration of human happiness from Santa Barbara to Qingdao?

I think now you're touching the issue of taking away American jobs. This does not have to happen if you offshore to China. You might not add more jobs in Cali, but you don't necessarily need to fire the workers in Cali once you have the China facility up and running.

One must remember, that the concept of a "national" economy is essentially a goner now. It is now a global economy. And if I have to mention it, that was also the work of the USA (remember the WTO and GATT?). Where do you think SD Co. buy their Copper, Ferrite materials and plastics?

That said, I'm pretty sure a HUGE chunk of SD's business is still with the continental USA, so I guess the company can still do the same things they're doing and be happy with it.


Dealers don't always benefit when the price of an item drops. They make less money per unit that they sell, so they have to work harder and sell more units to make the same money that they made before the price drop. Shipping doesn't get cheaper, nor do rent, utilities, employees, insurance, etc.

That is all true when you can't lower costs.

If we take for example, just the material costs (which I would think is over 50% of the cost of any pickup), if you slash 10% of that, you can always slash 10% of the retail/purchase price without paying less the employees.



The key is maintaining the perception of quality. You could have all the quality you want; you could have the same or better quality with overseas manufacturing, but if people assume, think, or read online that the quality has dropped, it won't do you much good.

I don't totally agree with this. Quality is quality. The end user will always find out sooner or later. Sure, if by lowering prices or moving manufacturing facilities create that perception of lower quality, the sales could take a hit. In the long run however, and with smart marketing strategies, you could almost always recover and come out stronger.

The opposite of course is a disaster. What if a Company makes an inferior product, but through marketing, creates the perception of a superior product? They will likely get some short-term gains, but sooner or later, the inferior product will catch up on them and they will surely fold if they don't do anything to improve quality.


How do you know this? Do you have a business plan for them?

I don't have a business plan, but by judging the minimum wages in Cali versus minimum wages say in Baoan, China, SD Co. can hire more people to wind pickups. Again, the key is quality -- and I believe you can get the same quality copper wire, magnets, pole pieces and plastics in China.

I can't help but think of Celestion Speakers. They were able to pull it off. Of course you know that most of your electronics are being made in China -- including the computer you're typing on right now, and the TV you use to watch your fave shows.

Yes, but could the Seymour Duncan Company do it? Do they even want to?

Only Duncan management will know. I'm just saying, they can do so.

Just playing devil's advocate here. Some companies choose to grow by going public, and it's a big, big topic. It's harder to talk about being small and family-owned after the IPO. As a consumer, I find it a little harder to feel good about a company when I know that all or most of the people who own it don't work there. That they often buy into companies because of speculation on the stock price and not because they care what goes on there.

That's the beauty of Limited Liability Companies (LLCs). Sure, the owners (shareholders) need not really care about what goes on inside the company (they're not liable anyway) for as long as they get a reasonable ROI. However, that is not always bad. The key is getting the right people to run the company, i.e. top management down to the factory workers. There are so many advantages in going public, but it is mainly the access to capital which is the biggest one. More capital allows you to fund R&D, expand product lines, increase volume and sales, etc. etc. Meanwhile, many private or family-owned companies go under because they don't have access to capital.

BTW, I'm sick of this topic. If I come back here, Evan has my permission to repo my A2P.

I understand. This is probably my last post in this matter as well. I just thought I needed to respond.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top