ErikH
Well-known member
Haze Guitars blog is AWESOME, thanks for reminding me! Correct me if I'm wrong, but you would have a graduate string action for fixed radius too. As the Haze blog says (and you too): "as you would with any setup". The lower strings need a little more space to ring out, thaat's a given, not a function of the radius. So I see no extra compromise for the compound . If the bridge radius is set with the compound board in mind, the strings just simply don't have any other choice but to track the compound board, methinks.
Yes, correct. I can get my Les Paul (straight 12") a lot lower than my Warmoths (compound 10-16"). The Warmoths are still low but that straight 12" can get crazy low. I bend a lot so if it gets too low and flat, I'll fret out bending on the lower frets. Can't have that.
In this case, I would think that having the nut radiused at 12" and the bridge at 17-18" (the extension of the cone), that it would be fine. I mean, 12-16", that's 4 inches from the 1st to last fret. Another 2 inches from the last fret to the bridge sounds about right. This is without doing the math.
