Re: When gear addiction long surpasses your ability
I don't get the presumption that a person's gear must be relative to their playing ability. The only thing a person's gear should relate to is their abiltiy to AFFORD it, period.
I wonder if isn't just jealousy that perpetuates this notion.
Personlly, I don't care what gear a person uses. I'm only impressed by what they are able to produce from it's use.
Probably because it skips what would normally be a common sense progression. I know I went through it and so did everybody I personally know who is into guitars and gear.
Step 1
You decide that (insert guitar player here) is your idol and you have to learn to play that stuff. So, you get that 200 dollar amp and guitar package and start the learning process. If you get bored or decide its not for you, you're out 200 bucks. If you progress and decide this is cool and you must progress farther, proceed to the next step.
(Mine was a martin stinger strat copy and a rascal solid state amp with no distrotion to speak of)
Step2
You're sticking to it and making progress, but your limited by your gear, so you upgrade to a nice mid-price range guitar and maybe a good higher wattage solid state/modeling amp or an affordable tube amp. At this point, there is really no looking back. You're addicted and have been at it for a few years and now your really getting good. You're now really serious, so you hooked up with some buddies and now you are again limited by gear and need to upgrade.
(This is when i bought my first guitar with my own money. A Charvel strat with a licensed floyd and a fender amp.)
Step 3
You are in a band and need to keep up with the drummer and bass player. There are gigs in your future so, viola, gibson les paul and marshall half stack. You have arrived.
(this is when I got a gibson les paul studio and a peavey 5150 half stack.)
Ive since demoted myself from Step 3 back down to Step 2 and my stuff reflects that, though its obviously of my own choice. No band, no gigs plus long hiatuses from playing at all means I dont need or warrant the high end gear, so I dont have any.
Though, id have to say the Jackson DK2 I currenty have would eat the Gibson LP I had for lunch, so im not really hurting at all for a #1 guitar. Wouldnt mind having a solid #2 though. :naughty:
Of course, wouldnt it be somewhat obvious that possibly all that cash might be better focused on something more constructive toward the current situation. Something like, I dunno, ummm, guitar lessons maybe?