Re: Which aftermarket pickups worked for you in a PRS CU24
FWIW, I've gotten the best versatility with a 36th PAF neck and a Tonezone bridge... But to get there I went w/50's wiring, 6-way rotary (Neck; Neck/Bridge parallel; Bridge; Neck/Bridge series; Neck/Bridge parallel (out of phase); Neck/Bridge series (out of phase)), and coil taps.
I agree that paf's are a tough fit and 90% of the time I run the neck split... That said, I think the "amp/eq/setup" wisdom is key to pickup utility for me w/that guitar. I set my amp's eq around the tonezone with a volume around 7, and then fiddle with guitar volume & tone/booster pedal/eq pedal to dial in the "70's/metal/djenty/jazzy/insert bad imitation of style here."
Seths and antiquities always seem to do clean and creamy well regardless of the instrument. I loved my A3/UOA5 combo for smooth runs, but I loved stealing Kojak's advice on that combo so much they ended up in my 335 and never went back. I have a Dillion (PRS knock-off) that i have standard 3-way switching on with a sentient/pegasus combo and i *love* that set/will never change it out. Again, the key for utility for me is the eq-ing of the amp/pedal setup around the instrument. I can find *awesome* tones (bear in mind i'm a total hack with no taste in music... No setup fixes that

) for live playing or studio recording with my PRS-style guitars, but i've never been able to switch between a LP, Strat, Explorer, etc and my PRS's without re-eq-ing. The construction of the guitar is kind of "in-between" those two, which makes it easier on my back but more of an application-specific instrument/i get the best results when i think about the sound ahead of time... And *that* to me has made chasing pickups for a PRS challenging. So my Dimarzio/PRS gives me enough tonal options to dial in something really specific, and my SD/Dillion gives me enough "oomph-meets-articulation" to back off the volume and cover the "basic" clean/jazzy to heavy range when i'm riffing or woodshedding.
Regarding PRS's in general, there's that great exaggeration about "les pauls are so fat that it's like painting a portrait with a roller. Use a tele or a strat when you want details," and while that's an extreme i think it's no mistake that there isn an equivalent statement for PRS's. i kinda think about PRS 24's like a Swiss army knife... They have amazing tones but they're precision-oriented... It's not my first choice when i need a saw or a scalpel, but when i need something in-between it allows me to access a million gradients in-between... And that can be pretty maddening if i want to nail someone *else's* tone with that guitar. So choosing PRS pickups either means committing the signal chain to an existing tone or diving in to something new/unknown for it to be enjoyable (instead of maddening).
That said, when i think of robben and jimmy, i think of Fender products

and i don't mean that flippantly like "so donate that PRS to the forum!" but more like "awesome taste, but i think part of that creamy sound is in the plank + maple meets single coil prior to pedal chain." Just messing around after reading your post, i get closest with splitting and a very subtle sd pu booster pedal and sustainer post-eq on my wiring beast. But my antiquities-laden telecaster copy can do a pretty fair imitation out of the gate. If you've got the chops to keep up w/those cats you'll probably sound miles better than the rest of us even with First Act pickups

. If you're dead-set on a swap, Creamery '59s or Cream T '59sshould get you there... And there's nothing more "24-ish" than an Abraxas set. Mule neck from bkp is also pretty creamy.
As always/when in doubt - depending on your budget there are two answers that will not fail: Call MJ, or p/m Zhangbucker
