Why are some guitars 'Tighter' than others?

Re: Why are some guitars 'Tighter' than others?

I know what you mean tone :)
Gibson lp studios have a loose feel to them compared to standards. I know it`s not about the setup(a-b) when it comes to those guitars,there are other factors like the stiffness of the wood etc.(The amount of wood used in the neck,qality of the wood,how it`s sawn) No matter what people says you`ll never get a studio to play like a standard.
When it comes to strats there are other factors as well. I`v just purchased a callaham neck plate that is fater than regular ones and is supposed to stiffening up the neck a bit.(this can be heard when doing bends etc).
Obviously setup is important to a certain point but it`s not the whole truth :)
 
Last edited:
Re: Why are some guitars 'Tighter' than others?

Play a top-wrapped TOM bridge and you will see what he is talking about. A steeper break over the saddle will give a tighter feel to the strings. It seems to me height and break at the nut would also play a part.
This is dead nuts on.

Although it can't be described as "tension," the "slinky" feel is definitely evident when top wrapping a TOM/Stop Tailpiece guitar. It takes no money, just wrap the strings from neck towards bridge and then over-
 
Re: Why are some guitars 'Tighter' than others?

This is dead nuts on.

Although it can't be described as "tension," the "slinky" feel is definitely evident when top wrapping a TOM/Stop Tailpiece guitar. It takes no money, just wrap the strings from neck towards bridge and then over-

This might help a stiff guitar loosen up a bit but it still does`nt explain the difference:)
BTW: I find stiffer guitars to be better quality
 
Re: Why are some guitars 'Tighter' than others?

All things being equal (parts, construction, etc.) the truss rod adjustment will make the most difference in feel. I tend to set the truss rod according to feel as opposed to listening for buzzes. Under high gain (or even the clean channel), the extremely subtle buzzes aren't heard, but the guitar "feels" right.
 
Re: Why are some guitars 'Tighter' than others?

All things being equal (parts, construction, etc.) the truss rod adjustment will make the most difference in feel. I tend to set the truss rod according to feel as opposed to listening for buzzes. Under high gain (or even the clean channel), the extremely subtle buzzes aren't heard, but the guitar "feels" right.

OK,let`s put it this way :)
1: Setup does make a difference on A guitar.
2: The setup does`nt matter if you compare a studio and a standard that
have the exact same setup. In this case you`ll find that there IS a difference
in the way they`re constructed and that`s the reason why the standard feel tighter than the studio :)
In this thread i find all the setup stuff as good additional info but it`s not what
Tone is asking for........I THINK hahahaahaahhahahaahhahah
 
Re: Why are some guitars 'Tighter' than others?

This might help a stiff guitar loosen up a bit but it still does`nt explain the difference:)
BTW: I find stiffer guitars to be better quality

Have you done this?

I can't make any comments about "quality."

What I will say is that I have guitars that rule. When I topwrap the tailpiece it entirely changes the feel.
 
Re: Why are some guitars 'Tighter' than others?

Have you done this?

I can't make any comments about "quality."

What I will say is that I have guitars that rule. When I topwrap the tailpiece it entirely changes the feel.

I`m not saying that the topwraping doesn`t make a difference ,if you say so i`m pretty sure it does :) The clue is, if you have a studio and a standard (an example) with the topwraping and all the other setups exact the same the standard still will feel a bit tighter compared to the studio :)
 
Re: Why are some guitars 'Tighter' than others?

I`m not saying that the topwraping doesn`t make a difference ,if you say so i`m pretty sure it does :) The clue is, if you have a studio and a standard (an example) with the topwraping and all the other setups exact the same the standard still will feel a bit tighter compared to the studio :)

I don't know about that.

I've got two LP 58 RIs. They're both great guitars. Good wood, good hardware, good everything.

By topwrapping it ENTIRELY changes the feel of the guitars. Night and day difference.

That's not saying that with it strung "traditionally" it's a "better" guitar... Just different.

I can't say that the "tension" on the strings translates into a "better" guitar. In other words, taking a POS Jazzmaster copy and putting a Buzzstop on it will not make it a better guitar than a standard Jazzmaster.
 
Re: Why are some guitars 'Tighter' than others?

Just to clarify a bit:
I use the studio-standard comparison cause there`s a lot
of guitarists that make this "stiffness" comment on these.Many of us like
to think that the only difference between the two is the cosmetics and the way they`re set up. What i`v learned after a lot of a-b testing on several of these models(90`s models) is that there is a difference in the way they`re constructed(wood quality etc) and this is the reason why one feel tighter than the other.
GOLDENBOY: When i`m saying that stiffness is a sign on good quality i mean guitars built "stiff".Top quality wood
is one of the things that add stiffness to a guitar since it tends to be more dry.
Great tension on the strings is good for the sound too,there`s no doubt about it :)
 
Last edited:
Re: Why are some guitars 'Tighter' than others?

[Simpleton]My Fender (style) guitars feel WAY stiffer than my Gibson (style) guitars.[/simpleton]

What do I win?
 
Re: Why are some guitars 'Tighter' than others?

[Simpleton]My Fender (style) guitars feel WAY stiffer than my Gibson (style) guitars.[/simpleton]

What do I win?

You win good sustain,tone and output compared to a simular guitar with less "stiffness". Pleace don`t compare a strat to a gib,you`ll need to do this comparison with two simular guitars to make any
sence out of it :)
 
Last edited:
Re: Why are some guitars 'Tighter' than others?

You win good sustain,tone and output. Pleace don`t compare a strat to a gib,you`ll need to do this comparison with two simular guitars to make any
sence out of it :)

I attribute most of it to scale length. That's just me, though, a simpleton.
 
Re: Why are some guitars 'Tighter' than others?

Yes,that`s true when you compare a stat scale to a gib scale neck.
 
Re: Why are some guitars 'Tighter' than others?

The Top wrap bridge makes most sense to me.

Kaffiman, i dont know if i agree about stiffer is better. i like the looseness of a guitar. to tight and it looses fattness.

Plus loose guitars for me are way more comfy to play.
IM really interested to see what Zerb has to say about the distance from nut to string tuner. That is why i wondered about Halens Kramer 5150 that had the long bannana headstock. Also i am sure that Hendrix's axes, being righties strung up for a lefty must have made a difference in tone as well. I assume that would have made the Lower wound E string looser and the higher strings punchier?? is this correct?
 
Re: Why are some guitars 'Tighter' than others?

It`s all about taste :) BUt a set up with the right angle on the strings over the nut and the bridge are supposed to give you some better sustain and tone due to the down preassure. A stiff/dry neck will also transfere the vibrations better. But as i said,if you like it better another way i totally understand that:)
 
Last edited:
Re: Why are some guitars 'Tighter' than others?

oh crap just had a revelation. so theoretically Floyd rose bridge guitars will feel tighter cause of the locking nut??? this kinda makes the guitar shorter in a way???
that is why my USACG is looser feeling that my Ibanez, cause the Ibanez has a floyd??????
It´s definitely a contributing to a tighter feel, because the "slinkiness" of a string has to do directly with the total stretchable length.

Let me explain: when you bend or fret a string, the string becomes stretched. This stretching happens along the entire "non locked" length of the string, including tuner windings. As a result, a string that has a longer "non speaking" length at either or both ends of the scale will rise in tension rising slower as it gets stretched, making it easier to bend but also increasing the distance (tension increase) needed to reach the same final pitch.

Bridge saddles have a lot to do with it. Pick up two similar strats, one with vintage bridge saddles and one with modern saddles. The vintage saddles will give it a slinkier looser feel.

Yes and no. Many modern strat bridge saddles cause the string to rest on the rear of the saddle in an attempt to increase the area of the contact surface between saddle and string. As a result, these saddles should in theory feel a bit slinkier.

BUT: our fingers can feel very minute changes in tension. The total difference between a .009 and a .010 is only about 3 pounds along the entire speaking length (approx. 13 lbs vs. approx. 16), so barely .12 lbs per inch. And that´s something I think we can all agree is a pretty apparent difference, a 9 vs a 10.

Knowing that, is easy to understand the kind of difference that can be actually felt can result from a MUCH lower tension increase, very literally .5mm in bridge saddle height can make a world of difference because of the slight action raise (= more stretching) as well as the resulting increase in string length between the saddle front and anchor hole. Though ironically the actually serves to counteract the effects of the raise, but since the speaking length is much longer in comparison than the 1nch or so from saddle to anchor, the action raise causes the significantly more pronounced effect on overall tension.

Play a top-wrapped TOM bridge and you will see what he is talking about. A steeper break over the saddle will give a tighter feel to the strings. It seems to me height and break at the nut would also play a part.
:bigok:

The stiffness of the neck material is also something to consider. My aluminum necked guitar is hella stiff for a 24.75" scale. It's almost neck-through and hollowed out on the inside....almost unbreakable. I've put 12's on tuned to Standard and the neck barely moves (no truss rod).
YES, most definitely. A neck (and joint) that flexes less transfers more of the energy your hand spends on fretting to the string itself, giving a slightly stiffer feel.

All things being equal (parts, construction, etc.) the truss rod adjustment will make the most difference in feel. I tend to set the truss rod according to feel as opposed to listening for buzzes. Under high gain (or even the clean channel), the extremely subtle buzzes aren't heard, but the guitar "feels" right.

While I set the rod the same way, I disagree strongly that it is the strongest factor in "slinkiness"... it is definitely a factor, as it affects relief and therby action, as well as slightly changing the angle at which the strings move compared to the fretboard by changing the curvature of the neck slightly. But in my experience many other factors are notably more pronounced.
[Simpleton]My Fender (style) guitars feel WAY stiffer than my Gibson (style) guitars.[/simpleton]

What do I win?
You get today´s "Captain Obvious" award, congratulations :D:dance: :beerchug:

The Top wrap bridge makes most sense to me.
Ah, then you have undertood the general principle at least in part, good job:)

Kaffiman, i dont know if i agree about stiffer is better. i like the looseness of a guitar. to tight and it looses fattness.
Personal preference. I actually have guitars that I purposely keep a bit Looser because I like the way the feel influences my playing style in those particular tunings, but for the most part I too prefer for the guitar to be "stiffer" as it serves to give my fingers feedback on whether it likes what I´m doin or not ;)

Plus loose guitars for me are way more comfy to play.

YAAA, especially when you just drop the strap 2 notches and let the grooves flow :headbang:
...
 
Re: Why are some guitars 'Tighter' than others?

...


IM really interested to see what Zerb has to say about the distance from nut to string tuner. That is why i wondered about Halens Kramer 5150 that had the long bannana headstock.
Well, Eddie uses a Floyd so he´ll never know what the tonal difference is :laugh2:

Also i am sure that Hendrix's axes, being righties strung up for a lefty must have made a difference in tone as well. I assume that would have made the Lower wound E string looser and the higher strings punchier?? is this correct?

For comparison´s sake, let´s take an axe and add a reverse headstock, we´ll use a banana /explorer /hockeystick because it´s more obvious.

If you look at before and after photos, the low e string is now ultralong while the high e is really short (compared to the inverse being true before the swap)

As a result, (compared to before), the low e string will feel slinkier but actually sound deeper and punchier. Now I´ll try to explain why, lol.

If you take a string and hit it really hard, the sound becomes "spongy" and "mushy", often a bit out of tune as well. This is because the tension increase from teh initial attack was so great that the string couldn´t "keep up" and went out of tune as a result.

Now, if you do that on an "extended" string, there is more string there to accomodate the extra tension. As a result, the string stays closer to being in tune (or evey sounds just perfect), because the extra length of string makes it less susceptible to extreme tension variations. Do it on an axe with a floyd and less than 4 springs and you´ll spend a half hour listening toi the floyd flutter back and forth, lol.

As a result, the high strings become a bit more brittle in tone. But also more sensitive to fretting nuances, which can result in it actually feeling and sounding "sweeter" if you have the technique and the soul to use this to your advantage.

And of course (if I haven´t said it yet): Materials and overall quality. as a brooooad generalization, better quality guitars with better woods will usually feel "stiffer" and "more solid" than a copy of the same guitar due the to closer fit and finish tolerances. This is because the greater attention to details such as quartersawing necks, drying wood and also the selection of wood for straight grain all plays a role in lowering the amount of flex in the final instrument.

Some manufacturers on the other hand roll exactly the other way, they attempt to build a controlled amount of flex into the instrument to add to the slinkiness. IIRC older Danos are a good example (though there it´s arguably material choices and unique hardware more than anything alse) ;)
 
Re: Why are some guitars 'Tighter' than others?

whew,

thats something i have to digest now....lol


Thanks Zerb, was definately educaitional

Now put down the new Ibanez so you can answer my Message i sent you! lol
 
Last edited:
Re: Why are some guitars 'Tighter' than others?

so if we unlock the floyd nut, theoretically it will effect tone?
 
Re: Why are some guitars 'Tighter' than others?

so if we unlock the floyd nut, theoretically it will effect tone?

Not just theoretically, and that´s probably he easiest experiment one can try to prove that either I´m right or your ears suck :laugh2:
 
Back
Top