Benjy_26
25's Nemesis
Hi everybody.
While reading some of the posts on the forum that had to do with alternate wirings for humbuckers, I noticed some users reffering to coil splitting as "coil tapping".
My first thought was that tapping & splitting are two very different things. You can only split a ' bucker, not tap it.
But then I thought: "Why not?"
When I play a dual 'bucker axe like my LP, I usually don't use splits.
Additionally, while I love the PG+ in the bridge of my LP, sometimes I wish it kicked a bit harder.
Why not have both?
Wind a PG as normal, including 4 conductor wiring. Instead of having start and finish wires, wire the white & red as taps, allowing you to switch between the normal wind ( ~8.4K) and another, hotter wind (say ~12K).
This would let you choose between a normal PAF sound, and a hotter, thicker hot-rod PAF tone using a normal push/pull pot.
Best of all, it would always be humbucking.
What do you guys think?
While reading some of the posts on the forum that had to do with alternate wirings for humbuckers, I noticed some users reffering to coil splitting as "coil tapping".
My first thought was that tapping & splitting are two very different things. You can only split a ' bucker, not tap it.
But then I thought: "Why not?"
When I play a dual 'bucker axe like my LP, I usually don't use splits.
Additionally, while I love the PG+ in the bridge of my LP, sometimes I wish it kicked a bit harder.
Why not have both?
Wind a PG as normal, including 4 conductor wiring. Instead of having start and finish wires, wire the white & red as taps, allowing you to switch between the normal wind ( ~8.4K) and another, hotter wind (say ~12K).
This would let you choose between a normal PAF sound, and a hotter, thicker hot-rod PAF tone using a normal push/pull pot.
Best of all, it would always be humbucking.
What do you guys think?