I was glad to see the updated readings on the new developmental site confirm what my ears told me had to be true, there was no way the WLH set was 25% lower powered than the 59's. Having had 59's, PG's, slash set, BB 1 & 3 and Dimarzio 36ths in the same guitar over the last few Years, the WLH didn't sound or feel lower output than these sets. BTW, after a lot of soldering for me the WLH are my favorites and back in that guitar to stay.
WLH MV data
- Thread starter AZ Picker
- Start date
Edgecrusher
New member
Re: WLH MV data
There are some big discrepancies with the MV charts... At this stage they are less useful than the DC resistance charts
There are some big discrepancies with the MV charts... At this stage they are less useful than the DC resistance charts
Re: WLH MV data
if the process was dont correctly with a control (piezo under the bridge or something like that) then the numbers are what they are and frequency response makes things sound louder or push the amp harder.
the demon may be 10k but its #43 not #42 so probably has less turns than the pg
if the process was dont correctly with a control (piezo under the bridge or something like that) then the numbers are what they are and frequency response makes things sound louder or push the amp harder.
the demon may be 10k but its #43 not #42 so probably has less turns than the pg