would it be better if i just go and get a POD?

Re: would it be better if i just go and get a POD?

The Atomic is not available in the UK yet. It's still waiting for their CE approval. The Atomic is pretty cool. I run 2 of them in stereo for recording and for live.

If you need to push 4x12's for big shows, the dedicated power amp might be for you, but for most gigs bands do, 2 of these are plenty. e.g. The guitarist on your with Joan Jett is using 2 Atomics and and they are playing fairly big outdoor shows like county fairs, and he said he gets great sound and has no issues at all hearing himself on stage.
 
Re: would it be better if i just go and get a POD?

Most "working musicians" will tell you that your certainly not going to get rich in that field. Not trying to discourage you or anything but don't take a dump on your education either. A minute percentage of musicians actually make it as "perfessional" musicians, and even then as you can see wathcing mtv...its not always the best ones but more luck or being at the right place at the right time.

I want to be surrounded by music in my career but I also need to pay the bills. So while I finish my AA and my audio technology at the community college, I work at Costco. A nice job that pays the bills and allows me to buy new toys :)

Oh, and next summer I go to MI (Musicians Institute) of Hollywood for the Recording Engineering Program. I'l produce and record the guys, and who knows, maybe hook up on a touring gig if they need a keyboard or extra guitar player. A plan? Oh yeah, I got that. ;)
 
Re: would it be better if i just go and get a POD?

InstituteOfNoise said:
The Atomic is not available in the UK yet. It's still waiting for their CE approval.
Awww man, I want one bad!!!

Hopefully it won't cost too much £££ over here too...
 
Re: would it be better if i just go and get a POD?

Mesa Studio or Quad Preamp maybe? They go really cheap if I'm right.
 
Re: would it be better if i just go and get a POD?

Grandor, professional musicians get paid.

Being the owner of both a Pod 2.0 and a Triaxis/2:90 rig I suppose that I have a little insite into the topic at hand. The Pod 2.0 is a pretty cool recording tool especially if you don't have a deceint room to record in. Like many home bound musicians I have been banashed into the basement. Cenemt floors and block walls, unfinished ceilings and duct work don't make for the prettiest audio recordings. being able to record direct and to store repeatable tones and levels is a big plus to the recording process.

I am able to get very good clean voices from the Pod 2.0 and I can also get close to my gained tones (Triaxis lead 1 red - Recto voice) but I haven't had alot of luck with the Mark II, III and IV voices. Maybe I just haven't tried hard enough but the hot Mark voices are harder to come by. The Mark I pushed voices (Rhythm green gain at 10, lead one green and lead one yellow) are extremely dynamic and very flexable and the Pod 2.0 just doesnt have the dynamic response to fake those on tape. It's a shame really because after you get over the brutalness that is available in the Lead 1 red voice, the Mark I voices are probably the most useful and toneful of all the Triaxis voices.

I guess it all depends on what your priorities are at the moment. If you are looking to record or play into headphones the Pod stuff is pretty nice but I dont know that I'd try to play live through a Pod. A Pod Pro and a solid tube power amp is probably a better way to go and the older 2.0 Pod Pros can probably be had at a reasonable price. The Vox stuff is also getting a lot of praise lately and that might be a way to go as well. One of my students just bought a 30 watt Vox modeler and he swears by it even though he owns a Mesa blue Angel (a killer amp on its own).

Start adding up everything you are going to need to make the Pod 2.0 a live rig before you decide anything. By the time you get a power amp and speakers plus a controller to do your switching you may find that a used Flextone II or one of the Vox offerings is more affordable and more useful.

Then start saving like there is no tomorrow and avoid playing through a tweaked triaxis/2:90 rig. If you go and do that nothing else is going to make you happy. There really is no comparison between a modeling amp in the cans and a Triaxis/2:90 rig opened up in a room.
 
Re: would it be better if i just go and get a POD?

Grandor said:
What do you believe qualifies someone to be a 'professional musician'?

getting paid

yes, i've gotten paid for gigs. most of the itme it was just $100, a few itmes it was $200. i could get into a gigging band if i wanted to but i want tio work on my own stuff at the moment.


Most "working musicians" will tell you that your certainly not going to get rich in that field. Not trying to discourage you or anything but don't take a dump on your education either. A minute percentage of musicians actually make it as "perfessional" musicians, and even then as you can see wathcing mtv...its not always the best ones but more luck or being at the right place at the right time.

im definitely not giving up on education, but my point is that i want to be surrounded by music. i do plan to go to college, so i know my educations got to be good for where i want to go.

i'd be using the POD for recording, and with my band too. so no gigs yet unfortunately :(

i know the whole idea of the dynamics issue with non tube amps, whihc is why i was always hesitant of the POD. i think my guitar teacher has a POD 2.0, maybe he can sell it? hmm..
 
Re: would it be better if i just go and get a POD?

You have to check out th pod xt live now that it's out and on the line6 site. I think that is a killer unit.
 
Re: would it be better if i just go and get a POD?

The POD's not bad. It doesn't exactly capture my Mark 4, but it can get pretty close. THe best thng to do is to mix and match and go for the sound you want rather than the exact amp/speaker models.

That said, right now, I use mine clean and just run my pedalboard into it. THat's given me pretty nice results too.

Brett
 
Back
Top